Tagle v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 38

ORDER that 5 Motion to Enforce Court's Order is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that 30 Motion for Records/Court Case Documents is denied. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/8/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF NEVADA, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ___________________________________ ) 13 I. 7 8 9 10 11 VICTOR TAGLE, 2:15-cv-00216-JCM-PAL ORDER DISCUSSION 14 On June 1, 2015, this court entered a screening order and directed plaintiff to file an 15 amended complaint within 30 days from the date of that order. (ECF No. 3 at 9). The order 16 stated that, if plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, the case would proceed on the 17 excessive force and due process claims only. (Id. at 10). The order also granted plaintiff’s 18 motion to extend his copy work limit by another $5.00. (Id.). 19 On June 24, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the court’s order to extend plaintiff’s 20 copy work limit. (ECF No. 5). Based on the motion, it appears that prison officials refused to 21 honor the extension. (Id. at 3). 22 The court denies this motion at this time. The court directs plaintiff to raise this issue 23 in his upcoming mediation with the court and prison officials scheduled for March 4, 2016. 24 (ECF No. 35). Additionally, the court denies plaintiff’s motion for records/court case documents. (ECF 25 26 No. 30). Plaintiff may also raise this issue during his scheduled mediation. 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 3 4 5 II. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to enforce court’s order (ECF No. 5) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for records/court case documents (ECF No. 30) is denied. 6 7 February 8, 2016. DATED: This _____ day of January, 2016. 8 9 _________________________________ United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?