Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
38
ORDER that 5 Motion to Enforce Court's Order is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that 30 Motion for Records/Court Case Documents is denied. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/8/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
___________________________________ )
13
I.
7
8
9
10
11
VICTOR TAGLE,
2:15-cv-00216-JCM-PAL
ORDER
DISCUSSION
14
On June 1, 2015, this court entered a screening order and directed plaintiff to file an
15
amended complaint within 30 days from the date of that order. (ECF No. 3 at 9). The order
16
stated that, if plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, the case would proceed on the
17
excessive force and due process claims only. (Id. at 10). The order also granted plaintiff’s
18
motion to extend his copy work limit by another $5.00. (Id.).
19
On June 24, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the court’s order to extend plaintiff’s
20
copy work limit. (ECF No. 5). Based on the motion, it appears that prison officials refused to
21
honor the extension. (Id. at 3).
22
The court denies this motion at this time. The court directs plaintiff to raise this issue
23
in his upcoming mediation with the court and prison officials scheduled for March 4, 2016.
24
(ECF No. 35).
Additionally, the court denies plaintiff’s motion for records/court case documents. (ECF
25
26
No. 30). Plaintiff may also raise this issue during his scheduled mediation.
27
///
28
///
1
2
3
4
5
II.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to enforce court’s order
(ECF No. 5) is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for records/court case documents (ECF No.
30) is denied.
6
7
February 8, 2016.
DATED: This _____ day of January, 2016.
8
9
_________________________________
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?