Rivera v. Cox et al
Filing
2
ORDER that 1 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis, which the court construes from the financial certificate and inmate account statement, is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall file the petition for a writ of habeas corp us pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall send petitioner a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 form with instructions. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the d ate that this order is entered in which to file an amended petition to correct the noted deficiencies. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall clearly title the amended petition as such by placing the word "AMENDED" immediately above "Pe tition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254" on page 1 in the caption, and petitioner shall place the docket number, 2:15-cv-00221-GMN-GWF, above the word "AMENDED." Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF: blank 2254 form w/instructions to petitioner - MMM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
1
2
3
4
RUDOLPH WILLIAM RIVERA,
5
Petitioner,
6
vs.
7
Case No. 2:15-cv-00221-GMN-GWF
JAMES “GREGORY” COX, et al.,
8
ORDER
Respondents.
9
10
Petitioner, who is a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections, has
11
submitted a financial certificate and a statement of his inmate account (ECF No. 1), which the court
12
construes as an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1). Petitioner also has submitted
13
a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court finds that petitioner is
14
unable to pay the filing fee.
15
Petitioner is in custody pursuant to a judgment of conviction of a state court. Consequently,
16
28 U.S.C. § 2254 governs this action. Petitioner has not used the correct petition form, and some
17
information that the court needs to evaluate the petition is missing. Petitioner will need to file an
18
amended petition on the correct form. Petitioner will need to re-allege all his grounds for relief, or
19
they will be waived. See King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987). Petitioner also will
20
need to name the correct respondent, who is the warden of the prison where he is a prisoner.
21
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF
22
No. 1), which the court construes from the financial certificate and inmate account statement, is
23
GRANTED. Petitioner need not pay the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00).
24
25
26
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall file the petition for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall send petitioner a petition for
27
a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 form with instructions. Petitioner shall have
28
thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered in which to file an amended petition to
1
correct the noted deficiencies. Neither the foregoing deadline nor any extension thereof signifies or
2
will signify any implied finding of a basis for tolling during the time period established. Petitioner
3
at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal limitation period under 28
4
U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) and timely asserting claims. Failure to comply with this order will result in
5
the DISMISSAL of this action.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall clearly title the amended petition as such
7
by placing the word “AMENDED” immediately above “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
8
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254” on page 1 in the caption, and petitioner shall place the docket
9
number, 2:15-cv-00221-GMN-GWF, above the word “AMENDED.”
10
DATED this 17th day of June, 2015.
11
12
_________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?