Aiken v. Snee et al
Filing
6
ORDER Adopting 4 Report and Recommendation. It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Patricia Aikens complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/5/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Patricia Aiken,
Case No.: 2:15-cv-227-JAD-VCF
Plaintiff
5
6
7
Order Adopting Report and
Recommendation [Doc. 4]
and Dismissing Action
With Prejudice
v.
Thomas M. Snee, et al.,
Defendants
8
9
10
Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach entered an order and report and recommendation on April
11
14, 2015, granting plaintiff Patricia Aiken’s request to proceed in forma pauperis and
12
recommending that her complaint be dismissed with prejudice.1 Objections to Judge Ferenbach’s
13
report and recommendation were due May 4, 2015.2 No objection has been filed. “[N]o review is
14
required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”3
15
Accordingly, and with good cause appearing,
16
It is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach’s report and recommendation [Doc.
17
4] is ADOPTED.
18
It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Patricia Aiken’s complaint is DISMISSED with
19
prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.
20
DATED May 5, 2015.
_________________________________
Jennifer A. Dorsey
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
1
26
2
27
Although objections were due on May 2, 2015, this day was a Saturday and thus the response
period was extended to the next business day. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 6(a)(1)(C).
3
28
Doc. 4.
Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). See also Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?