Acosta v. Kurtz et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 8 Report and Recommendation; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 10/14/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8

JUAN ACOSTA,

9

Plaintiff,

10

CLARK COUNTY, et al.,

12

ORDER

v.

11

Case No. 2:15-cv-0232-LDG-GWF

Defendants.

13
14

On July 31, 2015, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s

15

complaint be dismissed with prejudice (#8). The court has reviewed the report and

16

recommendation and concludes that the magistrate judge’s analysis is sound. Furthermore, in the

17

absence of any objection to the report and recommendation, the court need not review de novo any

18

factual determination made by the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)( C). Accordingly,

19

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the report and recommendation (#8) is ADOPTED.

20

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without

21

prejudice.

22
23

DATED this ____ day of October, 2015.

24
25
26

________________________
Lloyd D. George
United States District Judge