Hammond v. Correa et al
Filing
10
ORDER Granting 9 Unopposed MOTION to Remand to State Court. IT IS ORDERED THAT the United States, having disclaimed any interest in the property which is the subject of this action, is hereby dismissed as a party. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this case is remanded to the District Court, Clark County, Nevada, where it was originally filed, for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/28/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Certified Copy of Order and Docket Sheet Sent to State Court - TR)
Case 2:15-cv-00250-JCM-PAL Document 9-1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 1
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
M. DARIN HAMMOND,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
GILBERT CORREA, MARGARITA
)
CORREA, GILBERT CORREA AND,
)
MARGARITA CORREA, TRUSTEES OF
)
THE GILBERT AND MARGARITA
)
CORREA LIVING TRUST, DATED JUNE
)
20, 2006, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, )
AHERN RENTALS, INC., COLORADO
)
ELECTRIC SUPPLY, WESTERN
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, U.S. BANK
)
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE )
FOR JPMORGAN 2007-S2, MORTGAGE
)
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, )
INC., and NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE
)
CORPORATION,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)
Civil No. 2:15-CV-00250 JCM-PAL
ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REMAND
TO STATE COURT
Upon consideration of the United States’ motion and for good cause shown, the United
16
States’ motion is GRANTED and IT IS ORDERED THAT the United States, having disclaimed
17
any interest in the property which is the subject of this action, is hereby dismissed as a party.
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this case is remanded to the District Court, Clark
19
County, Nevada, where it was originally filed, for all further proceedings.
20
21
SO ORDERED.May 28, 2015.
___________________________
22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?