Wilson-Perlman et al v. Mackay et al

Filing 32

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all discovery is stayed in this case until the earlier of 20 days after a ruling on 22 Motion to Dismiss or 2/5/16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will not be required to file a proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order until the earlier of 20 days after a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss or 2/5/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/5/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 *** 5 6 DANELL WILSON-PERLMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 7 8 vs. 9 ANDREW J. MACKAY, et al., 2:15-cv-00285-JCM-VCF Defendants. 10 11 ORDER Before the court is Danell Wilson-Perlman, et al., vs. Andrew J. Mackay, et al., case number 12 2:15-cv-00285-JCM-VCF. The court held a hearing on August 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. (#31). The parties 13 canvassed and stipulated to a stay of discovery pending the ruling on the Motion to Dismiss (#22). 14 Good Cause Appearing, 15 16 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all discovery is stayed in this case until the earlier of twenty (20) days after a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss (#22) or February 5, 2016; 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will not be required to file a proposed Discovery 19 Plan and Scheduling Order until the earlier of twenty (20) days after a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss or 20 February 5, 2016; 21 22 23 After January 25, 2016, the parties may file a stipulation to further stay discovery and the filing of a proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, if the Motion to Dismiss (#22) is still pending. Dated this 5th day of August, 2015. 24 25 _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?