U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Ascente Homeowners Association et al

Filing 107

ORDER re Admonishment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/21/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 U.S. BANK, N.A., Case No.: 2:15-cv-00302-JAD-NJK Plaintiff(s), ORDER v. 11 ASCENTE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 The undersigned presided over a settlement conference in this case on June 11 and June 14 21, 2021. The Court declines to take formal action related thereto, but hereby puts the parties and 15 counsel on notice of the following. 16 First, party representatives appearing for a settlement conference must have full settlement 17 authority. Docket No. 98 at 1. A representative who appears for a settlement conference with a 18 pre-arranged settlement limit does not have full settlement authority. See, e.g., Wilson v. KRD 19 Trucking West, 2013 WL 836995, at *2-4 (D. Nev. Mar. 6, 2013). Indeed, a key component of the 20 settlement conference process is for parties to reevaluate their positions or valuations based on the 21 discussions taking place, which is impeded if the corporate representative is unable to budge from 22 a preset number regardless of the developments that are occurring. See, e.g., Nick v. Morgan’s 23 Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 597 (8th Cir. 2001) (quoting district court decision). The Court expects 24 strict compliance with this requirement moving forward. 25 Second, although a settlement conference is in some ways informal in nature, the Court 26 expects that appropriate decorum is observed. Absent circumstances not present here, such as 27 indigency, a corporate representative should not appear for a settlement conference from what 28 appears to be an unkempt teenager’s bedroom with that teenager sleeping in the background during 1 1 portions of the settlement conference. Nor should a corporate representative appear for a 2 settlement conference in casual attire and a baseball cap. Although this issue is not as problematic 3 as the authority issue addressed above, the Court also expects more appropriate behavior in the 4 future. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: June 21, 2021 7 ______________________________ Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?