Gurshin v. Bank of America, N.A.
Filing
108
ORDER Granting 107 Motion to Extend Time re 106 Motion to Compel re Discovery. Responses due by 11/8/2016. Replies due by 11/15/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
ALEXIS GURSHIN,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
vs.
BANK OF AMERICA, et al.,
8
Defendants.
2:15-cv-00323-GMN-VCF
ORDER
[Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Time ECF No.
107]
9
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Time to Supplement and Respond to
10
Defendant Bank of America’s RFAs (Nos. 29-127) and Request for Extension to Oppose and Related
11
Motion Practice. (ECF No. 107).
12
13
Plaintiff has given sufficient reason for the extension of time to supplement and respond to
discovery.
14
Accordingly,
15
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Time to Supplement and
16
Respond to Defendant Bank of America’s RFAs (Nos. 29-127) and Request for Extension to Oppose and
17
Related Motion Practice (ECF No. 107) are GRANTED.
18
Plaintiff must serve her supplement and respond to Defendant Bank of America’s Request for
19
Admission (Nos. 29-127) on or before November 1, 2016. Any opposition to Defendant Bank of America,
20
N.A.’s Motion for Order Deeming Admitted Defendant’s Second Set of Requests for Admissions to
21
Plaintiff, Or Alternatively, Compelling Responses (ECF No. 106) must be filed on or before November
22
8, 2016. Any reply in support of the Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion for Order Deeming
23
Admitted Defendant’s Second Set of Requests for Admissions to Plaintiff, Or Alternatively, Compelling
24
///
25
///
1
Responses (ECF No. 106) must be filed on or before November 15, 2016.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
DATED this 18th day of October, 2016.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?