Gurshin v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing 108

ORDER Granting 107 Motion to Extend Time re 106 Motion to Compel re Discovery. Responses due by 11/8/2016. Replies due by 11/15/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 ALEXIS GURSHIN, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 vs. BANK OF AMERICA, et al., 8 Defendants. 2:15-cv-00323-GMN-VCF ORDER [Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Time ECF No. 107] 9 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Time to Supplement and Respond to 10 Defendant Bank of America’s RFAs (Nos. 29-127) and Request for Extension to Oppose and Related 11 Motion Practice. (ECF No. 107). 12 13 Plaintiff has given sufficient reason for the extension of time to supplement and respond to discovery. 14 Accordingly, 15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Time to Supplement and 16 Respond to Defendant Bank of America’s RFAs (Nos. 29-127) and Request for Extension to Oppose and 17 Related Motion Practice (ECF No. 107) are GRANTED. 18 Plaintiff must serve her supplement and respond to Defendant Bank of America’s Request for 19 Admission (Nos. 29-127) on or before November 1, 2016. Any opposition to Defendant Bank of America, 20 N.A.’s Motion for Order Deeming Admitted Defendant’s Second Set of Requests for Admissions to 21 Plaintiff, Or Alternatively, Compelling Responses (ECF No. 106) must be filed on or before November 22 8, 2016. Any reply in support of the Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion for Order Deeming 23 Admitted Defendant’s Second Set of Requests for Admissions to Plaintiff, Or Alternatively, Compelling 24 /// 25 /// 1 Responses (ECF No. 106) must be filed on or before November 15, 2016. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 DATED this 18th day of October, 2016. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?