Harris v. City of Henderson et al
Filing
90
ORDER granting 89 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Cal J. Potter, III and Cal J. Potter, IV withdrawn from the case. Attorney designation deadline: 10/25/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Plaintiff to last known address - JM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
HARVESTER HARRIS,
8
10
Plaintiff,
v.
9
Case No. 2:15-cv-00337-GMN-PAL
ORDER
(Mot WD Atty – ECF No. 89)
CITY OF HENDERSON, et al.
Defendants.
11
12
Before the court is counsel for plaintiff Potter Law Offices’ Motion to Withdraw as
13
Counsel (ECF No. 89). The motion represents that plaintiff’s counsel recently had major surgery,
14
and is temporarily and physically unable to practice law, and cannot continue representation in this
15
matter. There are only two attorneys in the law firm, and his associate and son is unable to continue
16
representing the plaintiff. As such, the firm seeks leave to withdraw as counsel of record.
17
Currently, there is a fully briefed Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 85) pending before the district
18
judge.
19
Having reviewed and considered the matter, and for good cause shown,
20
IT IS ORDERED that:
21
1. The Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 89) is GRANTED.
22
2. Plaintiff shall have until October 25, 2017, in which to retain substitute counsel who
23
shall make an appearance in accordance with the requirements of the Local Rules of
24
Practice, or shall file a notice with the court that he will be appearing in this matter pro
25
se.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
3. The clerk of the court shall serve plaintiff with a copy of this order at his last known
2
address:
3
Harvester Harris
3380 Brussels Street
Las Vegas, NV 89169
4
5
DATED this 25th day of September, 2017.
6
7
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?