Norman v. The State of Nevada et al

Filing 11

ORDER that Magistrate Judge Leens 10 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and her findings and conclusions are adopted. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED and the Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/19/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Zel Norman, 5 Case No.: 2:15-cv-00339-JAD-PAL Plaintiff 6 7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [ECF 10] v. The State of Nevada, et al., 8 Defendants 9 10 Magistrate Judge Peggy Leen entered a report and recommendation on October 27, 2015, 11 recommending that I dismiss pro se plaintiff Zel Norman’s complaint without prejudice to Norman’s 12 ability to file a new action in which he pays the $350.00 filing fee in full or submits a completed 13 application to proceed in forma pauperis.1 Objections were due by November 13, 2015, and Norman 14 has neither filed an objection nor requested an extension to do so. LR IB 3–2. 15 “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless 16 objections are filed.” Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also 17 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th 18 Cir. 2003). Accordingly, 19 20 21 22 23 It is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leen’s Report and Recommendation [ECF 10] is ACCEPTED and her findings and conclusions are adopted; It is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE THIS CASE. DATED November 19, 2015. _________________________________ _________________________ _ ______ _____ __ _ Jennifer A. Dorsey Jennifer A. Dorsey n Do s United States District Judge ed tate ed States t Judge g 24 25 26 27 28 1 ECF 10.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?