Fisher v. MJ Christensen Jewelers, LLC

Filing 106

ORDER re 99 Motion to Compel. The Court hereby SETS a hearing for 1:00 p.m. on 9/7/16, in Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/24/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 STEVEN FISHER, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MJ CHRISTENSEN JEWELERS, LLC, a Nevada ) limited liability company, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-00358-RFB-NJK ORDER 12 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s renewed motion to compel, Defendant’s opposition, and 13 Plaintiff’s reply. Docket Nos. 99, 104, 105. The Court hereby SETS a hearing for 1:00 p.m. on September 14 7, 2016, in Courtroom 3D. Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s counsel, Defendant Le Vian’s counsel, and a corporate 15 representative of Defendant Le Vian are required to be present. Plaintiff and Defendant Le Vian must be 16 prepared to discuss: (1) the authority, if any, that supports broad discovery in this case; (2) the impact, if 17 any, of the recent amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 on this motion1; (3) the authority, if 18 any, that supports limiting discovery to the confines of the class definition; and (4) whether Plaintiff has 19 met his burden of demonstrating that the requested discovery is likely to substantiate the proposed class. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: August 24, 2016 23 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 Specifically, Rule 26(b)(1) now states that “[p]arties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case.” 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?