Patterson v. Williams, et al.

Filing 2

ORDER: Clerk of the Court Shall Add Adam Paul Laxalt,Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as Counsel for Respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 45 days from the date on whichthe petition is served upon them to appear in this action, and to answer or otherwise respond to the petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/18/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 MICHAEL PATTERSON, 9 Petitioner, 2:15-cv-00362-JCM-VCF 10 vs. 11 BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, SR., et al., ORDER 12 13 Respondents. _________________________________/ 14 15 This action is a petition for writ of habeas corpus by Nevada prisoner Michael Patterson. 16 Patterson has paid the filing fee for his petition. The court has reviewed Patterson’s petition 17 (ECF No. 1) pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States 18 District Courts, and determines that it merits service and a response by respondents. 19 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. 21 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall electronically serve upon respondents a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) and a copy of this order. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 45 days from the date on which 24 the petition is served upon them to appear in this action, and to answer or otherwise respond to the 25 /// 26 /// 1 petition. Respondents shall, in their initial responsive pleading, whether it is a motion or an answer, 2 raise all potential procedural defenses, including the statute of limitations, lack of exhaustion, and 3 procedural default. 4 5 Dated this _____ day of May, 2015. May 18, 2015. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?