Posner et al v. Israel et al
Filing
51
ORDER Granting 50 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 41 MOTION to Dismiss. Replies due by 10/26/2015. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/23/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Attorney General
FREDERICK J. PERDOMO
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Nevada Bar No. 10714
Bureau of Litigation
Public Safety Division
100 No. Carson St.
Carson City, NV 89701-4717
Tel: 775-684-1250
Attorneys for Defendants Michael A. Cherry,
Michael L. Douglas, Mark Gibbons, James W. Hardesty,
Ronald T. Israel, Ron Parraguirre, Kristina Pickering, and
Nancy M. Saitta
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
LANCE T. POSNER, an individual; EVA M
POSNER, an individual
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
18
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00377-GMN-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME OF THE DATE SET
FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST]
vs.
RONALD T. ISRAEL; JAMES W.
HARDESTY; RON PARRAGUIRRE;
MICHAEL L. DOUGLAS; MICHAEL A.
CHERRY; NANCY M. SAITTA; MARK
GIBBONS; AND KRISTINA PICKERING
19
Defendants.
20
21
COMES NOW, the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record and hereby
22
stipulate and agree that the time for Defendants the Honorable District Court Judge Ronald
23
Israel and the Honorable Nevada Supreme Court Justices James Hardesty, Ron Parraguirre,
24
Michael Douglas, Michael Cherry, Nancy Saitta, Mark Gibbons, and Kristina Pickering
25
(Judicial Defendants) to file a reply in support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #41)
26
shall be extended five days from October 22, 2015 up to and including October 26, 2015.
27
///
28
///
Office of the
Attorney General
100 N. Carson St.
Carson City, NV
89701-4717
1
Reason for Extension
1
2
Although Undersigned Counsel for the Judicial Defendants has started to draft the
3
Judicial Defendants reply in support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, his time has been
4
limited as a result of drafting an Answering Brief in an appeal before the U.S. Court of
5
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and attending to other matters in his caseload. The Judicial
6
Defendants seek this limited five day extension of time to afford their counsel sufficient time to
7
complete this brief. Accordingly, this stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose
8
of delay. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline.
9
DATED this 22nd day of October, 2015.
10
DATED this 22nd day of October, 2015.
THE LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT W. LUECK
ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Attorney General
By:
By:
11
12
13
14
/s/
_______________
ROBERT W. LUECK, Esq
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendants
15
16
17
_________________
FREDERICK J. PERDOMO
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Public Safety Division
IT IS SO ORDERED:
DATED:
October 23
, 2015.
18
19
20
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
21
___________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Office of the
Attorney General
100 N. Carson St.
Carson City, NV
89701-4717
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I certify that I am an employee of the Office of the Attorney General, State of Nevada,
3
and that on this 22nd day of October, 2015, I caused to be deposited for mailing, a true and
4
correct copy of the foregoing, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OF
5
THE DATE SET FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
6
DISMISS [FIRST REQUEST], on the following:
7
8
Robert W. Lueck, Esq
528 So. Casino Center Dr. #311
Las Vegas, NV 89101
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
11
An employee of the
Office of the Attorney General
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Office of the
Attorney General
100 N. Carson St.
Carson City, NV
89701-4717
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?