Friedman v. Cox et al

Filing 53

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 51 the motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED and that Lisa A. Rasmussen is withdrawn as counsel. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/17/2019. (Copy of Order and 50 Status Report sent to P at HDSP and CCDC) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 KENNETH FRIEDMAN, 10 Petitioner, 11 v. Case No. 2:15-cv-00380-RFB-CWH ORDER 12 13 14 15 16 JAMES COX, et al., Respondents. This stayed habeas matter comes before the Court on retained counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel. (ECF No. 51.) 17 The motion reflects that petitioner advised counsel that her services were no longer 18 needed, that he requested that she file a motion to withdraw, and that she served the 19 motion on petitioner at his then-current High Desert State Prison address. No opposition 20 to the motion has been filed by petitioner. The motion therefore will be granted, and 21 petitioner therefore now is proceeding pro se in this federal habeas matter. 22 Petitioner must continue to file status reports at 120-day intervals, and the next 23 status report is due on January 7, 2020. If he fails to do so, the stay potentially may be 24 lifted and the case may be dismissed. The Court notes that petitioner apparently has 25 retained new counsel in the state court proceeding. If petitioner wishes for that counsel 26 to instead file the January 7, 2020, status report and subsequent status reports and filings, 27 counsel will need to properly enter an appearance in this matter prior to making filings on 28 behalf of petitioner in the federal case. 1 1 2 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the motion to withdraw as counsel (ECF No. 51) is GRANTED and that Lisa A. Rasmussen is withdrawn as counsel. 3 The Clerk of Court shall reflect on the docket sheet, in a manner consistent with 4 the Clerk’s current practice for such matters, that petitioner now is proceeding pro se. 5 The Clerk further shall send a copy of this order both to the High Desert State Prison 6 address and NDOC back number shown in the motion to withdraw and also to the 7 following address with the different back number for CCDC: 1 Kenneth A. Friedman, ID # 01858832 Clark County Detention Center 330 South Casino Center Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89101 8 9 10 11 A status report remains due in this matter by petitioner for January 7, 2020. The 12 Clerk shall additionally send petitioner in proper person together with this order a copy of 13 the most recent status report filed by Ms. Rasmussen. 14 DATED: December 17, 2019. 15 16 17 ________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The state district court’s online docket record reflects that, subsequent to service of the motion to withdraw being effected, petitioner was transported to be housed at the Clark County Detention Center (CCDC) so that he could more readily consult with his current counsel in the state court proceedings. However, petitioner currently appears on the online inmate locator for both High Desert and CCDC. The Court will not keep sending mail to two addresses. If petitioner continues to proceed pro se in this matter, he must keep the Clerk updated as to a current, single, mailing address with a written notice of change of address. He should so advise the Clerk promptly following receiving this order, unless an attorney – also promptly – instead will be entering an appearance on his behalf. Neither the Court nor the Clerk have an obligation to attempt to track petitioner’s whereabouts to ensure that he receives court mailings. So he should promptly make sure that the Clerk has a mailing address at which either he or instead a counsel of record herein will receive notices from the Court. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?