Roberts v. Clark County School District
Filing
68
ORDER Granting 65 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines. Replies due by 11/23/2015 re 52 MOTION to Compel. Responses due by 11/19/2015 re 57 MOTION to Compel and 60 MOTION for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/16/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Case 2:15-cv-00388-JAD-PAL Document 65 Filed 11/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ENGLAND LAW OFFICE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
630 SOUTH THIRD STREET
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA89101
(702) 385-3300 FAX (702) 385-3823
10
11
KATHLEEN J. ENGLAND, NV Bar No. 206
ENGLAND LAW OFFICE
630 South Third Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Phone: 702.385.3300; Fax: 702.385.3823
E-mail: kengland@englandlawoffice.com
JASON R. MAIER, NV Bar No. 8557
MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON
400 South Seventh Street, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Phone: 702.629.7900; Fax: 702.629.7925
E-mail: jrm@mgalaw.com
MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE, NV Bar No. 10931
MCLETCHIE SHELL LLC
701 East Bridger Ave., Ste. 520
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Phone: 702.728.5300; Fax: 702.471.6540
E-mail: maggie@nvlitigation.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradley Roberts
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
13
14
Case No.: 2:15-CV-00388-JAD-PAL
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFF
TO FILE:
16
BRADLEY ROBERTS, individually,
17
Plaintiff,
(1) HIS REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
COMPEL (Doc. #61); (FIRST REQUEST)
18
vs.
19
20
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT;
and DOES I through X, inclusive,
Defendant.
21
(2) HIS OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL
DISCOVERY RESPONSES (Doc. #57);
(FIRST REQUEST) AND
(3) HIS OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER
(Doc. #60) (FIRST REQUEST)
22
23
24
Plaintiff Bradley Roberts and Defendant Clark County School District hereby agree and
25
stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff Bradley Roberts to file the following and ask that the
26
Court approve same, it being the first extension request for all three:
27
(1)
Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc.
28
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-00388-JAD-PAL Document 65 Filed 11/13/15 Page 2 of 2
1
#61, filed on November 9, 2015) which is currently due on November 19, 2015, be extended to
2
and including November 23, 2015, for which the Court has scheduled a hearing on December
3
8, 2015;
(2)
4
Plaintiff’s response/opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery
5
Responses (Doc. #57, filed on October 30, 2015) which is currently due on November 16, 2015,
6
be extended to and including November 19, 2015; and
(3)
7
Plaintiff’s response/opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Qualified Protective
8
Order (Doc. #60, filed on October 30, 2015) which is currently due on November 16, 2015, be
9
extended to and including November 19, 2015.
ENGLAND LAW OFFICE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
630 SOUTH THIRD STREET
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA89101
(702) 385-3300 FAX (702) 385-3823
10
Plaintiff’s counsel requested these extensions for good cause, including the other matters
11
being attended to in this timeframe, including depositions, and the upcoming Thanksgiving
12
holidays, and in order to allow Plaintiff to prepare a thorough reply and the two (2) oppositions
13
and have accorded Defendant CCSD counsel reciprocal courtesy for extensions.
14
Dated: November 13, 2015
Dated: November 13, 2015
15
By:
By:
16
17
18
19
20
/s/
KATHLEEN J. ENGLAND
ENGLAND LAW OFFICE
630 South Third Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
JASON R. MAIER
DANIELLE BARRAZA
MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON
21
MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE
MCLETCHIE SHELL LLC.
22
/s/
BRUCE YOUNG
ETHAN THOMAS
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
3960 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. #300
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Attorneys for Defendant,
Clark County School District
Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradley Roberts
23
IT IS SO ORDERED:
24
25
26
PEGGY A. LEEN
United States Magistrate Judge
27
Dated: November 16, 2015
28
k:\roberts, bradley\pleadings (federal)\stip and extension for reply and opps re motions to compel.docx
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?