Roberts v. Clark County School District

Filing 68

ORDER Granting 65 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines. Replies due by 11/23/2015 re 52 MOTION to Compel. Responses due by 11/19/2015 re 57 MOTION to Compel and 60 MOTION for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/16/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-00388-JAD-PAL Document 65 Filed 11/13/15 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ENGLAND LAW OFFICE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 630 SOUTH THIRD STREET LAS VEGAS, NEVADA89101 (702) 385-3300  FAX (702) 385-3823 10 11 KATHLEEN J. ENGLAND, NV Bar No. 206 ENGLAND LAW OFFICE 630 South Third Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Phone: 702.385.3300; Fax: 702.385.3823 E-mail: kengland@englandlawoffice.com JASON R. MAIER, NV Bar No. 8557 MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON 400 South Seventh Street, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Phone: 702.629.7900; Fax: 702.629.7925 E-mail: jrm@mgalaw.com MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE, NV Bar No. 10931 MCLETCHIE SHELL LLC 701 East Bridger Ave., Ste. 520 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Phone: 702.728.5300; Fax: 702.471.6540 E-mail: maggie@nvlitigation.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradley Roberts 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 Case No.: 2:15-CV-00388-JAD-PAL 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE: 16 BRADLEY ROBERTS, individually, 17 Plaintiff, (1) HIS REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL (Doc. #61); (FIRST REQUEST) 18 vs. 19 20 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; and DOES I through X, inclusive, Defendant. 21 (2) HIS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES (Doc. #57); (FIRST REQUEST) AND (3) HIS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER (Doc. #60) (FIRST REQUEST) 22 23 24 Plaintiff Bradley Roberts and Defendant Clark County School District hereby agree and 25 stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff Bradley Roberts to file the following and ask that the 26 Court approve same, it being the first extension request for all three: 27 (1) Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 28 Page 1 of 2 Case 2:15-cv-00388-JAD-PAL Document 65 Filed 11/13/15 Page 2 of 2 1 #61, filed on November 9, 2015) which is currently due on November 19, 2015, be extended to 2 and including November 23, 2015, for which the Court has scheduled a hearing on December 3 8, 2015; (2) 4 Plaintiff’s response/opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery 5 Responses (Doc. #57, filed on October 30, 2015) which is currently due on November 16, 2015, 6 be extended to and including November 19, 2015; and (3) 7 Plaintiff’s response/opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Qualified Protective 8 Order (Doc. #60, filed on October 30, 2015) which is currently due on November 16, 2015, be 9 extended to and including November 19, 2015. ENGLAND LAW OFFICE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 630 SOUTH THIRD STREET LAS VEGAS, NEVADA89101 (702) 385-3300  FAX (702) 385-3823 10 Plaintiff’s counsel requested these extensions for good cause, including the other matters 11 being attended to in this timeframe, including depositions, and the upcoming Thanksgiving 12 holidays, and in order to allow Plaintiff to prepare a thorough reply and the two (2) oppositions 13 and have accorded Defendant CCSD counsel reciprocal courtesy for extensions. 14 Dated: November 13, 2015 Dated: November 13, 2015 15 By: By: 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ KATHLEEN J. ENGLAND ENGLAND LAW OFFICE 630 South Third Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 JASON R. MAIER DANIELLE BARRAZA MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON 21 MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE MCLETCHIE SHELL LLC. 22 /s/ BRUCE YOUNG ETHAN THOMAS LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. #300 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Attorneys for Defendant, Clark County School District Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradley Roberts 23 IT IS SO ORDERED: 24 25 26 PEGGY A. LEEN United States Magistrate Judge 27 Dated: November 16, 2015 28 k:\roberts, bradley\pleadings (federal)\stip and extension for reply and opps re motions to compel.docx Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?