Amini v. CSAA General Insurance Company

Filing 53

ORDER Granting 51 Stipulation to Substitute Attorney. George M. Ranalli is substituted in the place of Nathan Reinmiller and Sabrina G Wibicki for Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/09/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 LANDON AMINI, 8 Plaintiff, 11 ORDER v. 9 10 Case No. 2:15-cv-00402-JAD-PAL (Subst Atty – Dkt. #51) CSAA GENERAL COMPANY, INSURANCE Defendant. 12 13 This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Substitution of Attorney (Dkt. #51) filed 14 December 7, 2015. George M. Ranalli of Ranalli & Zaniel, LLC seeks leave to be substituted in 15 the place and stead of Nathan Reinmiller and Sabrina Wibicki of Alverson Taylor Mortenson, et 16 al. for Defendant CSAA General Insurance Company. LR IA 10-6 provides that the signature of 17 an attorney to substitute in a case “constitutes an express acceptance of all dates then set for 18 pretrial proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or in any court order.” LR IA 10- 19 6(d) also provides that the substitution of an attorney “shall not alone be reason for delay of 20 pretrial proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case.” 21 A hearing on several outstanding motions is set for December 22, 2015 at 10:30 am. 22 Having reviewed and considered the matter, and good cause appearing, 23 IT IS ORDERED that: 24 1. The Substitution of Attorney (Dkt. #51) is APPROVED. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2. George M. Ranalli of Ranalli & Zaniel is substituted in the place of Nathan 2 Reinmiller and Sabrina Wibicki of Alverson Taylor Mortenson, et al, for Defendants 3 CSAA General Insurance Company, subject to the provisions of LR IA 10-6(c) and 4 (d). 5 DATED this 9th day of December, 2015. 6 7 PEGGY A. LEEN PEGGY A. LEEN E LE N UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?