Hicks v. Dollar General Market
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 15 the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hicks's discrimination claim is dismissed without prejudice and that all claims against Richard A. Lindsey, Tiffany Doe, Bianca Doe, and Cindy Doe are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dollar General Market, et al.,
Order Adopting Report and
[ECF No. 15]
On February 8, 2017, Magistrate Judge Peggy Leen entered a report recommending that
plaintiff Natasha Hicks’s discrimination claim be dismissed without prejudice and that the claims
against defendants Richard Lindsey, Tiffany Doe, Bianca Doe, and Cindy Doe be dismissed.
“[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are
filed.”1 Objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation were due by February 22,
2017, and no objections have been filed.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 15] is ADOPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hicks’s discrimination claim is dismissed without
prejudice and that all claims against Richard A. Lindsey, Tiffany Doe, Bianca Doe, and Cindy Doe
Dated this 1st day of March, 2017.
__ _ ________ __
Jennifer A. Dorsey
United States District Judge
Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?