Hicks v. Dollar General Market

Filing 18

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 15 the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hicks's discrimination claim is dismissed without prejudice and that all claims against Richard A. Lindsey, Tiffany Doe, Bianca Doe, and Cindy Doe are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Natasha Hicks, 5 Plaintiff 2:15-cv-00405-JAD-PAL 6 v. 7 Dollar General Market, et al., Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 15] 8 Defendants 9 10 On February 8, 2017, Magistrate Judge Peggy Leen entered a report recommending that 11 plaintiff Natasha Hicks’s discrimination claim be dismissed without prejudice and that the claims 12 against defendants Richard Lindsey, Tiffany Doe, Bianca Doe, and Cindy Doe be dismissed. 13 “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are 14 filed.”1 Objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation were due by February 22, 15 2017, and no objections have been filed. 16 17 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 15] is ADOPTED. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hicks’s discrimination claim is dismissed without 19 prejudice and that all claims against Richard A. Lindsey, Tiffany Doe, Bianca Doe, and Cindy Doe 20 are DISMISSED. 21 Dated this 1st day of March, 2017. 22 _________________________________ ______________________ __ _ ________ __ ___ Jennifer A. Dorsey nifer Dorsey e rse United States District Judge ted States ta e Judge g 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?