Elgas et al v. Straub
Filing
4
ORDER Adopting in full 3 Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/24/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
THOMAS ELGAS,
4
5
6
Plaintiff,
vs.
RICHARD STRAUB,
7
Defendant.
8
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:15-cv-0433-GMN-CWH
ORDER
9
10
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States
11
Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman, (ECF No. 3), which states that this case should be
12
dismissed without prejudice.
13
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a
14
United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);
15
D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo
16
determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,
17
or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.
18
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is
19
20
ct of an
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized
21
22
where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
23
1122 (9th Cir. 2003).
24
Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed.
25
Accordingly,
Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 3), is
ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The
Clerk is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case.
DATED this 24th day of September, 2015.
6
7
8
___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?