IGT v. Aristocrat Technologies Inc.

Filing 46

ORDER Granting 45 Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for IGT to Answer Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.'s Counterclaims and for the Parties to Complete Rule 26(f) Conference. IGT answer to Counterclaims reset for 7/20/2015. Parties will conduct the Rule 26(f) conference on or before 8/10/2015. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 8/24/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 7/2/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-00473-GMN-GWF Document 45 Filed 07/01/15 Page 1 of 3 JEFF SILVESTRI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5779 McDONALD CARANO WILSON LLP 2300 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200 Las Vegas, NV 89102 Telephone: 702.873.4100 Facsimile: 702.873.9966 E-mail: jsilvestri@mcdonaldcarano.com ADAM K. MORTARA, ESQ. (pro hac vice) BRIAN C. SWANSON, ESQ. (pro hac vice) BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 54 West Hubbard Street, Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: 312.494.4400 E-mail: adam.mortara@bartlit-beck.com brian.swanson@bartlit-beck.com DANIEL C. TAYLOR, ESQ. (pro hac vice) BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 1899 Wynkoop Street, 8th Floor Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: 303.592.3100 E-mail: daniel.taylor@bartlit-beck.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA IGT, Civil Case No.: 2:15-cv-00473-GMN-GWF Plaintiff, v. ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR IGT TO ANSWER ARISTOCRAT TECHNOL OGI ES, I NC.’ S COUNTERCLAIMS AND FOR THE PARTIES TO COMPLETE RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE Defendant. ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD., and ARISTOCRAT INTERNATIONAL PTY. LTD., (First Request) Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. IGT, Counterclaim Defendant. JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME; NO. 2:15-cv-00473 Case 2:15-cv-00473-GMN-GWF Document 45 Filed 07/01/15 Page 2 of 3 Plaintiff IGT, Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. (“ ATI” ), and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty. Ltd (“ ATA” ) and Aristocrat International Pty. Ltd. (“ AI” ) (ATI, ATA, and AI collectively, “ Aristocrat” ) (IGT and Aristocrat collectively, the “ Parties” ), by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. ATI filed its Answer and Counterclaims to IGT’ s Complaint on June 8, 2015 (Dkt. No. 2. Also on June 8, 2015, ATA and AI filed a motion to intervene in order to join in certain 38). of ATI’ s counterclaims against IGT (Dkt. No. 39). The Court granted the motion to intervene on June 29, 2015, and ordered that ATA and AI file their responsive pleading by July 13, 2015 (Dkt. No. 44). 3. The deadline for IGT’ s answer to ATI’ s counterclaims is July 2, 2015. The deadline for IGT’ s answer to ATA and AI’ s counterclaims is August 6, 2015. 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(d), the deadline for the Parties’ Rule 26(f) conference is July 8, 2015, and the deadline for submitting a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order is July 22, 2015. 5. WHEREFORE, the Parties wish to adjust the upcoming deadlines to extend the time for IGT to answer ATI’ s counterclaims, to allow IGT to file a single answer to all of Aristocrat’ s counterclaims, and to extend the deadline for the Rule 26(f) scheduling conference until after all claims and counterclaims have been answered. Accordingly, the Parties have agreed as follows: a. IGT will file a single answer to all of Aristocrat’ s counterclaims on or before July 20, 2015. IGT will serve an answer to these counterclaims and will not file a motion to dismiss. b. The Parties will conduct the Rule 26(f) conference on or before August 10, 2015. c. The Parties will file a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(d) on or before August 24, 2015. 6. This is the first request for an extension of these deadlines. WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that this Court approve this stipulation and order that (a) IGT shall file a single answer to all of Aristocrat’ s counterclaims on or before July 20, 2015; (b) the Parties shall conduct the Rule 26(f) conference on or before August 10, 2015; and (c) the Parties JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME; NO. 2:15-cv-00473 1 Case 2:15-cv-00473-GMN-GWF Document 45 Filed 07/01/15 Page 3 of 3 shall file a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(d) on or before August 24, 2015. Dated this 1st day of July, 2015. For Plaintiff IGT: For Defendant Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.: McDONALD CARANO WILSON LLP SANTORO WHITMIRE, LTD. /s/ Jeff Silvestri /s/ Peter A. Swanson NICHOLAS J. SANTORO SANTORO WHITMIRE, LTD. 10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone: (702) 948-8771 Facsimile: (702) 948-8773 E-mail: nsantoro@santoronevada.com JEFF SILVESTRI McDONALD CARANO WILSON LLP 2300 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Telephone: (702) 873-4100 Facsimile: (702) 873-9966 E-mail: jsilvestri@mcdonaldcarano.com ADAM K. MORTARA BRIAN C. SWANSON BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 54 W. Hubbard Street, Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: (312) 494-4400 Facsimile: (312) 494-4440 E-mail: adam.mortara@bartlit-beck.com brian.swanson@bartlit-beck.com DANIEL C. TAYLOR BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 1899 Wynkoop Street, 8th Floor Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 592-3100 Facsimile: (303) 592-3140 E-mail: daniel.taylor@bartlit-beck.com ROBERT T. HASLAM COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 632-4700 Facsimile: (650) 632-4800 E-mail: rhaslam@cov.com GARY M. RUBMAN PETER A. SWANSON COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 662-6000 Facsimile: (202) 662-6291 E-mail: grubman@cov.com, pswanson@cov.com IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE July 2, 2015 DATED: June2, 2015 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME; NO. 2:15-cv-00473 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?