Freedman et al v. The Vons Companies, Inc. et al

Filing 40

ORDER that Plaintiff's 38 Renewed Motion to Remand to State Court is Denied without prejudice as premature. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/7/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4

Rosa Freedman,

5

Plaintiff

6

Order Denying Motion to Remand

v.

7

2:15-cv-0474-JAD-CWH

The Vons Companies, Inc., et al.,

8

[ECF 38]

Defendants

9
10

In November 2015, plaintiff filed a motion to remand based on her anticipation that the

11

court would grant her then-pending motion to add claims against diversity-destroying

12

defendants.1 I denied the motion to amend and the premature motion to remand during a

13

December 7, 2015, hearing.2

14

Plaintiff has filed another motion to remand, followed by a renewed motion to add claims

15

against allegedly diversity-destroying defendants.3 Again she puts the cart before the horse.

16

Unless and until this court grants leave to add claims against local defendants, plaintiff’s motion

17

to remand is unripe.

18
19

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s Renewed Motion to Remand to
State Court [ECF 38] is DENIED without prejudice as premature.

20

Dated this 7th day of January, 2015

21

_______________________________
_______________ ____
_ __ _ _ __ _
_
____
_
Jennifer A. Dorsey
er A Dorsey
r
United States District Judge
d States District Judge
te
te D
ud
ud

22
23
24
25
1

See ECF 27, 28, 32.

2

See minutes at ECF 37.

3

ECF 38, 39.

26
27
28