Grybowski et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
90
ORDER Granting 89 Second Stipulation of Dismissal. The Seventh Cause of action from Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs may file a motion to compel up through and including 7/1/2016. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/27/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:15-cv-00484-GMN-VCF Document 89 Filed 06/23/16 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
LAGOMARSINO LAW
ANDRE M. LAGOMARSINO, ESQ.
3005 West Horizon Ridge Parkway, Suite 241
Henderson, Nevada 89052
Telephone: (702) 383-2864
Facsimile: (702) 383-0065
Attorney for Plaintiffs
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
RYAN SMITH, individually and JAMES
"JAY" GRYBOWSKI, individually,
CASE NO: 2:15-cv-484-GMN-VCF
9
Plaintiffs,
N
'"
0
C\
00
10
co
-0
co
5)!2 11
vs.
SECOND OMNIBUS STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Zo
~ ",9
OM
VlOO
~ tM
~ ~8
::r:t:.
o
;~
12
13
~ ~.~ 14
co
p::: c.75."-
C/'J .-
~S
~'"
;l:"""
... 00
15
CON
00..":" 16
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE
COMPANY; and HP INC.,
Defendant.
Plaintiffs RYAN SMITH and JAY GRYBOWSKI, by and through their attorney of record,
000
o :s!R
o1l<'">
~O::o
el"-
o~
~ .~~
Andre M. Lagomarsino, Esq., of the law firm Lagomarsino Law, and Defendants HEWLETT17
00
_..c:
::0.. 18
:s:
.r;
PACKARD COMPANY, HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY; and HP INC., by
Vl
'n
"'",
20
~ ",00
d'9
0<">
-<
~ i32l
::cc
o :;~
Z
<;<">
12
""~
~
13
<"'1.§
~~
14
;s:'T
~~
-",'"
15
r./J ':; '"
~ t/.l."-
,-00
ORDER
",<"'1
Oo..~
",00
C)OJM 16
~N
-<
t:x::o
el"-
~ ·c §
2~
IT IS SO ORDERED:
17
£..c
:::"" 18
'"
<.>
~
V)
0
0
<">
19
20
21
22
23
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated:
-------------------------
_______________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
DATED this ____ day of June, 2016.
24
25
26
27
28
20f2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?