Korinek v. Colvin

Filing 28

ORDER Granting 27 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Daniel Talbert substituted in place of Carolyn Beth Chen for defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-00496-GMN-NJK Document 27 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney strict of Nevada DANIEL TALBERT Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 436-6559 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: daniel.talbert@ssa.gov 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 ANDREW KORINEK, Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ) ) Case No. 2:15-CV-00496-GMN-NJK ) ) NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY ) ) ) ) ) ) /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 26 -1- Case 2:15-cv-00496-GMN-NJK Document 27 Filed 04/11/16 Page 2 of 3 1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Commissioner of Social Security hereby designates 2 the following Special Assistant United States Attorney (SAUSA) as its counsel of record in the 3 above-captioned case: 4 Daniel Talbert Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 436-6559 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: dabiel.talbert@ssa.gov 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SAUSA Carolyn Chen should be terminated and receive no further notifications from the Court’s CM/ECF system. 12 13 Respectfully submitted, 14 DATED: March 18, 2016 15 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney /s/ Daniel Talbert DANIEL TALBERT Special Assistant United States Attorney 16 17 18 OF COUNSEL: 19 20 DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 12, 2016 __________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?