Korinek v. Colvin
Filing
28
ORDER Granting 27 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Daniel Talbert substituted in place of Carolyn Beth Chen for defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:15-cv-00496-GMN-NJK Document 27 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
strict of Nevada
DANIEL TALBERT
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 436-6559
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: daniel.talbert@ssa.gov
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
13
ANDREW KORINEK,
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
)
) Case No. 2:15-CV-00496-GMN-NJK
)
) NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY
)
)
)
)
)
)
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
26
-1-
Case 2:15-cv-00496-GMN-NJK Document 27 Filed 04/11/16 Page 2 of 3
1
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Commissioner of Social Security hereby designates
2
the following Special Assistant United States Attorney (SAUSA) as its counsel of record in the
3
above-captioned case:
4
Daniel Talbert
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 436-6559
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: dabiel.talbert@ssa.gov
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SAUSA Carolyn Chen should be terminated and receive no further notifications from the
Court’s CM/ECF system.
12
13
Respectfully submitted,
14
DATED: March 18, 2016
15
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
/s/ Daniel Talbert
DANIEL TALBERT
Special Assistant United States Attorney
16
17
18
OF COUNSEL:
19
20
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 12, 2016
__________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?