Aidini v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Filing
82
ORDER Denying 43 Motion in Limine regarding argument that Costco did not create the unsafe condition. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
ARTANO AIDINI,
5
6
7
Case No. 2:15-cv-00505-APG-GWF
Plaintiff,
v.
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
8
Defendant.
ORDER DENYING MOTION IN
LIMINE REGARDING ARGUMENT
THAT COSTCO DID NOT CREATE
THE UNSAFE CONDITION
(ECF No. 43)
9
10
Plaintiff Artano Aidini moves to preclude defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation from
11
making any reference or argument that anyone other than a Costco employee is responsible for
12
the location of the box that Aidini tripped on or otherwise arguing that Costco did not create this
13
“unsafe condition.”
14
The identity of the person responsible for placing the box where it was is a question for
15
the jury. Although Costco concedes that its employees put boxes in the vicinity of Aidini’s fall,
16
there is some evidence suggesting that another Costco customer could have nudged the box,
17
causing it to end up where it did. Aidini testified that around the time he fell, there were “other
18
people walking through” the area. ECF No. 69-1 at 7. Surveillance video shows that at least one
19
person, who did not work for Costco, walked through that area only three minutes before Aidini
20
fell. ECF No. 69-1. And even if Costco’s employees did put the box where it was, that would
21
not mean that it would be foreclosed from arguing to the jury that the box was not an “unsafe”
22
condition or that Aidini was partially responsible for the fall.
23
24
25
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff Artano Aidini’s motion in limine (ECF No.
43) is DENIED.
DATED this 10th day of April, 2017.
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?