Vita Bella Homeowners Association v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al

Filing 29

ORDER that 22 Motion to Stay Discovery is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 VITA BELLA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 6 7 8 Plaintiff, vs. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, et al., 9 10 2:15-cv-00515-JCM-VCF ORDER Defendants. This matter is before the Court is Fannie Mae and FHFA's Motion to Stay Discovery (#22). 11 Fannie Mae and FHFA request that discovery in this matter be stayed pending relevant rulings in 12 ongoing District of Nevada cases. Fannie Mae and FHFA represent that the central legal question in 13 this case is also in four current cases: Saticoy Bay LLC Series 1702 Empire Mine v. Fannie Mae (2:14- 14 cv-01975-KJD-NJK), Elmer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA (2:14-cv-01999-GMN-NJK), Williston 15 Investment Group, LLC v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (2:14-cv-02038-GMN-PAL), and Skylights LLC 16 v. Fannie Mae (2:15-cv-00043-GMN-VCF). Id. On July 13, 2015, the court granted Freddie Mac and 17 FHFA's Motions for Summary Judgment in Elmer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA (2:14-cv-01999-GMN- 18 NJK), Williston Investment Group, LLC v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (2:14-cv-02038-GMN-PAL), 19 and Skylights LLC v. Fannie Mae (2:15-cv-00043-GMN-VCF). A decision on the motion for summary 20 judgment has not been entered in Saticoy Bay LLC Series 1702 Empire Mine v. Fannie Mae (2:14-cv- 21 01975-KJD-NJK). 22 Fannie Mae and FHFA request a stay in order to avoid the expense of potentially unnecessary 23 discovery. (#22). Fannie Mae and FHFA have sufficiently established good cause for granting the stay 24 of discovery until the summary judgment motions in the related cases have been decided. Here, a 25 decision has not been reached in one of the related cases. 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Fannie Mae and FHFA's Motion to Stay Discovery (#22) is 3 granted. Discovery is stayed until an order has been issued on the motion for summary judgment in Case 4 No. 2:14-cv-01975-KJD-NJK. The parties must promptly notify the Court in this case of the decision on 5 the motion for summary judgment in Case No. 2:14-cv-01975-KJD-NJK. If necessary, the parties must 6 file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 14 days of the decision on the motion for 7 summary judgment. 8 DATED this 20th day of July, 2015. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?