BGC Partners, Inc. et al v. Avison Young (Canada), Inc. et al

Filing 482

ORDER granting 480 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond Re: 476 Motion for Reconsideration and 478 Report and Recommendation, Responses due by 8/23/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 8/11/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Case 2:15-cv-00531-RFB-EJY Document 482 Filed 08/11/21 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Robert S. Larsen, Esq. (NV Bar No. 7785)
Wing Yan Wong, Esq. (NV Bar No. 13622)
GORDON & REES LLP
300 South Fourth Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Nathaniel Kritzer (admitted pro hac vice)
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
1440 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
United States
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

11
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, NV 89101

Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP

10

12
13
14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants
Avison Young (Canada) Inc., Avison Young
(USA) Inc., Avison Young-Nevada, LLC,
Mark Rose, Joseph Kupiec, The Nevada
Commercial Group, and John Pinjuv
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
NEWMARK GROUP, INC., G&E ACQUISITION
COMPANY, LLC, and BGC REAL ESTATE OF
NEVADA, LLC,

18
19
20
21
22

AVISON YOUNG (CANADA) INC.; AVISON
YOUNG (USA) INC.; AVISON YOUNG NEVADA, LLC, MARK ROSE, THE NEVADA
COMMERCIAL GROUP, JOHN PINJUV, and
JOSEPH KUPIEC; DOES 1 through 5; and ROE
BUSINESS ENTITIES 6 through 10

23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

) CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-00531-RFB-EJY
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
) EXTEND TIME TO FILE
) RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
) MOTION FOR
) RECONSIDERATION [ECF. NO.
476] AND OBJECTION TO
) REPORT AND
) RECOMMENDATION [ECF. NO.
) 478]
)
) (First Request)
)
)

Case 2:15-cv-00531-RFB-EJY Document 482 Filed 08/11/21 Page 2 of 3

1

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiffs Newmark Group, Inc.

2

G&E Acquisition Company, LLC, and BGC Real Estate of Nevada, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) and

3

Defendants Avison Young (Canada) Inc., Avison Young (USA) Inc., Avison Young –

4

Nevada, LLC, Mark Rose, The Nevada Commercial Group, John Pinjuv, and Joseph Kupiec

5

(“Defendants”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:

6

1.

This is the first stipulation for extension of time for Defendants to respond to

7

Plaintiffs’ Motion (1) to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the

8

Second Amended Complaint and (2) For Leave to File Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint

9

(ECF No. 476) (the “Motion”) and Plaintiffs’ Objection to July 28, 2021, Finding and
Recommendation Regarding Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (ECF. No.

11
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, NV 89101

Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP

10

478) (the “Objection”).

12
13
14

2.

On June 10, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended

Complaint. ECF No. 458.
3.

The Court held a hearing on July 28, 2021 during which the Court denied,

15

without prejudice, Plaintiffs’ Motion to File a Third Amended Complaint and directed

16

Plaintiffs to file a motion to reconsider before the district court judge. (ECF No. 474.)

17

4.

On August 2, 2021, Plaintiffs filed their Motion and Objection.

18

5.

Defendants’ respective responses to the Motion and Objection would ordinarily

19
20

be due fourteen (14) days after filing, on August 16, 2021.
6.

Due to various attorney conflicts and competing deadlines including several

21

depositions taking place in this case and related cases involving the same parties, Defendants

22

requested an extension to respond to the Motion and Objection. The parties have reached an

23

agreement stipulating that Defendants be permitted an additional seven (7) days to respond to

24

Plaintiffs’ Motion and Objection, resulting in a response date of August 23, 2021.

25

7.

This stipulated extension is requested in good faith and for good cause, and is

26

not intended to unduly delay proceedings in any manner. Accordingly, the parties respectfully

27

request that the Court grant the proposed extensions discussed herein.

28
-2-

Case 2:15-cv-00531-RFB-EJY Document 482 Filed 08/11/21 Page 3 of 3

1

DATED: August 10, 2021

DATED: August 10, 2021

2

PISANELLI BICE PLLC

GORDON REES SCULLY
MANSUKHANI, LLP

By: Seth A. Horvath __________

By: Robert S. Larsen ________

Todd L. Bice, Esq., Bar No. 4534
Pisanelli Bice PLLC
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

Robert S. Larsen
Wing Y. Wong
Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP
300 S. 4th St., Suite 1550
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Tel. [phone]
Fax. [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, NV 89101

Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP

10

12
13
14
15

F. Thomas Hecht (pro hac vice)
Tina B. Solis (pro hac vice)
Seth A. Horvath (pro hac vice)
Nixon Peabody LLP
70 West Madison Street, Suite 3500
Chicago, Illinois 60602
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Newmark Group
Inc., G&E Acquisition Company, LLC,
and BGC Real Estate of Nevada, LLC.

Nathaniel J. Kritzer (pro hac vice)
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
Firm ID No. 43315
1114 6th Avenue
New York, NY 10036
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Avison
Young (Canada) Inc., Avison Young (USA)
Inc., Avison Young–Nevada LLC, Mark
Rose, Joseph Kupiec, The Nevada
Commercial Group LLC, and John Pinjuv

16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED:

19
20

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22

August 11, 2021

DATED:

23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-