BGC Partners, Inc. et al v. Avison Young (Canada), Inc. et al

Filing 683

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Exhibits 6-7, 10, 15-16, 18, 20-21, 23-26, 28,30-31, 34, 36-45, 47-49, 54, 56, and 60-67 to Plaintiff's Response to John Pinjuv and the Nevada Commercial Group's 660 Motion for Summary Judgment are and shall rema in sealed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unredacted version of Plaintiffs' 662 Response at is and shall remain sealed. See Order for Details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 6/15/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-00531-RFB-EJY Document 683 Filed 06/15/23 Page 1 of 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 NEWMARK GROUP, INC., G&E ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC and BGC REAL ESTATE OF NEVADA, LLC 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Case No. 2:15-cv-00531-RFB-EJY Plaintiff, ORDER v. AVISON YOUNG (CANADA) INC.; AVISON YOUNG (USA) INC.; AVISON YOUNG-NEVADA, LLC, MARK ROSE, THE NEVADA COMMERCIAL GROUP, JOHN PINJUV, and JOSEPH KUPIEC; DOES 1 through 5; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES 6 through 10, Defendants. 13 14 On May 31, 2023, the Court issued an Order denying without prejudice Plaintiffs’ two 15 Motions to Seal. ECF No. 675. Given the number of Exhibits requested to be sealed, the Court 16 instructed the parties to file a single joint status report identifying those exhibits the parties agreed 17 could be sealed and those on which there was disagreement, if any. Id. at 2. On June 14, 2023, the 18 parties submitted a status report in response to the Court’s Order. ECF No. 679. 19 20 The Court reviewed the parties’ report and accepts the parties’ identification of what is and is not properly sealed as accurate. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Exhibits 6-7, 10, 15-16, 18, 20-21, 23-26, 28, 22 30-31, 34, 36-45, 47-49, 54, 56, and 60-67 to Plaintiff’s Response to John Pinjuv and the Nevada 23 Commercial Group’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 660) are and shall remain sealed. 24 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unredacted version of Plaintiffs’ Response at ECF No. 662 is and shall remain sealed. 26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibits 10-18, 21-22, 24-44, 47-60, 64, 66, 68-69, 84-92, 27 94-96, 98-108, 110-111, 113, 115-116, 120-123, 125-127, 129, 131, 133-140, 143, 145, 147-153, 28 155-158, 161-181, 183, 186, 188, 189-191, 193- 194, and Appendices 1-5 to Plaintiff’s Response to 1 Case 2:15-cv-00531-RFB-EJY Document 683 Filed 06/15/23 Page 2 of 2 1 Avison Young (Canada) Inc., Avison Young (USA) Inc., Avison Young–Nevada LLC, Mark Rose, 2 Joseph Kupiec’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 667) are and shall remain sealed. 3 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unredacted version of Plaintiffs’ Response at ECF Nos. 669-670 is and shall remain sealed. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court will unseal Exhibits 32-33, 52, and 68- 6 70 to Plaintiff’s Response to John Pinjuv and the Nevada Commercial Group’s Motion for Summary 7 Judgment (ECF No. 660). 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court will unseal Exhibits 97, 119, and 128 9 to Plaintiff’s Response to Avison Young (Canada) Inc., Avison Young (USA) Inc., Avison Young– 10 11 Nevada LLC, Mark Rose, Joseph Kupiec’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 667). Dated this 15th day of June, 2023. 12 13 14 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?