BGC Partners, Inc. et al v. Avison Young (Canada), Inc. et al

Filing 725

ORDER granting 724 Stipulation TO EXTEND DEADLINES IN JULY 12, 2022, REVISED DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER ECF NO. 593 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 5/7/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Todd L. Bice, Esq., Bar No. 4534 Pisanelli Bice PLLC 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 214-2100 Facsimile: (702) 214-2101 tlb@pisanellibice.com Tina B. Solis Seth A. Horvath Nixon Peabody LLP 70 W. Madison Street, Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Telephone: (312) 977-4400 Facsimile: (844) 560-8137 tbsolis@nixonpeabody.com sahorvath@nixonpeabody.com (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiffs Newmark Group Inc., G&E Acquisition Company LLC, and BGC RealEstate of Nevada LLC 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Nathaniel Kritzer Steptoe & Johnson LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Tel. (212) 378-7535 Fax (212) 506-3950 nkritzer@steptoe.com (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendants Avison Young (Canada) Inc., Avison Young (USA) Inc., Avison Young–Nevada LLC, Mark Rose, Joseph Kupiec, The Nevada Commercial Group LLC, and John Pinjuv UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 16 17 Robert S. Larsen Wing Y. Wong Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP 300 S. 4th St., Suite 1550 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tel. (702) 577-9301 Fax. (702) 255-2858 rlarsen@grsm.com wwong@grsm.com NEWMARK GROUP INC., G&E ACQUISITION COMPANY LLC, and BGC REAL ESTATE OF NEVADA LLC, Plaintiffs, vs. AVISON YOUNG (CANADA) INC., AVISON YOUNG (USA) INC., AVISON YOUNG–NEVADA LLC, MARK ROSE, THE NEVADA COMMERCIAL GROUP, JOHN PINJUV, and JOSEPH KUPIEC; DOES 1 through 5; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES 6 through 10, Defendants. Case No. 2:15–cv–00531–RFB–EJY STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES IN JULY 12, 2022, REVISED DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF NO. 593) 1 Plaintiffs Newmark Group Inc., G&E Acquisition Company LLC, and BGC Real Estate 2 of Nevada (“Plaintiffs”), through their counsel, and Defendants Avison Young (Canada) Inc., 3 Avison Young (USA) Inc., Avison Young–Nevada LLC, Mark Rose, Joseph Kupiec, John 4 Pinjuv, and The Nevada Commercial Group (“Defendants”), through their counsel (together, the 5 “Parties”), jointly submit the following stipulation to extend the deadlines in the revised 6 discovery plan and scheduling order of July 12, 2022 (“Scheduling Order”) (ECF No. 593): 7 8 9 STIPULATION 1. On July 12, 2022, the Court entered a Scheduling Order stating that “[t]he joint pretrial report shall be filed within 60 days after the Court’s decision on dispositive motions.” 10 (ECF No. 593.) 11 2. 12 13 14 As of the date of this stipulation, the Scheduling Order remains the operative order for purposes of calculating the deadline for filing the joint pretrial order. 3. On February 15, 2024, the Court conducted a hearing on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (ECF No. 720.) 15 4. At hearing, the Court contemplated setting the case for trial in December 2024. 16 5. On March 31, 2024, the Court entered an order granting in part and denying in part 17 18 19 20 the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (ECF No. 723.) 6. Under the Scheduling Order, the parties’ joint pretrial order currently is due on May 30, 2024. 7. Having reviewed the Court’s Chambers Practices and Order Regarding Trial, the 21 Parties agree that, to promote efficient trial preparation, the following pretrial deadlines should be 22 entered. 23 8. On July 1, 2024, the parties shall exchange the following materials: 24 a. Exhibit lists and proposed exhibits. 25 b. Deposition designations. 26 c. Lists of trial witnesses indicating whether the witnesses will testify live or 27 by deposition designation, as well as briefly summarizing each witness’s 28 testimony. -2- 1 d. A brief statement by Plaintiffs as to the basis for subject-matter jurisdiction. 2 e. A brief summary of the claims and defenses that each party asserts remain 3 to be tried, including citations to any statutes on which the party relies. The 4 summaries shall also identify all claims and defenses previously asserted 5 that are not to be tried. 6 f. 7 Parties consent. 8 g. 9 Plaintiffs’ proposed statement regarding the number of trial days needed and whether the case will be tried to a jury. 10 h. 11 12 Proposed stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law to which all Plaintiffs’ proposed statement regarding whether the parties have consented to trial by a magistrate judge. 9. On August 2, 2024, the parties shall exchange the following materials: 13 a. Objections to exhibit lists and proposed exhibits. 14 b. Objections to deposition designations and counter-designations. 15 c. A brief statement by each Defendant as to the presence or absence of 16 subject-matter jurisdiction. 17 d. 18 which all parties consent. 19 e. 20 f. 22 24 25 26 27 Defendants’ response to proposed statement regarding the number of trial days needed and whether the case will be tried to a jury. 21 23 Responses to proposed stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law to Defendants’ response to proposed statement regarding whether the parties have consented to trial by a magistrate judge. 10. Between August 3, 2024, and August 12, 2024, the parties shall meet and confer regarding proposed stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law to which all parties consent. 11. On August 16, 2024, the parties shall exchange: a. Counter-counter-designations and objections to deposition counterdesignations. 28 -3- 1 b. Lists of exhibits to be offered in case in chief (with one star indicating 2 exhibits to which no party objects on grounds of authenticity and two stars 3 indicating exhibits to which no party objects on any grounds). 4 5 12. By August 27, 2024, the parties shall finalize the stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law discussed between August 3, 2024, and August 12, 2024. 6 13. On August 29, 2024, the parties shall file their joint pretrial order. 7 14. Following the submission of this stipulation, the Court shall set a trial date. 8 15. In accordance with the trial date, the Court shall schedule deadlines for the parties 9 10 11 to file motions in limine, jury instructions, voir dire questions, and, if the Court deems it necessary, pretrial memoranda of law. 16. The proposed scheduling modifications described above are requested in good 12 faith and made with good cause. They are not intended to delay or inconvenience the Court, but 13 rather to promote judicial economy and minimize the need for unnecessary court intervention. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 Hon. Elayna J. Youchah United States Magistrate Judge 16 17 DATED: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- May 7, 2024 1 Dated: May 7, 2024 2 Respectfully submitted by: 3 NIXON PEABODY LLP STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 4 By: By: 5 Todd L. Bice, Esq., Bar No. 4534 Pisanelli Bice PLLC 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 214-2100 Facsimile: (702) 214-2101 tlb@pisanellibice.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 /s/ Tina B. Solis Tina B. Solis Seth A. Horvath Nixon Peabody LLP 70 W. Madison Street, Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Telephone: (312) 977-4400 Facsimile: (844) 560-8137 tbsolis@nixonpeabody.com sahorvath@nixonpeabody.com (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiffs Newmark Group Inc., G&E Acquisition Company LLC, and BGC RealEstate of Nevada LLC /s/ Nathaniel J. Kritzer Robert S. Larsen Wing Y. Wong Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP 300 S. 4th St., Suite 1550 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tel. (702) 577-9301 Fax. (702) 255-2858 rlarsen@grsm.com wwong@grsm.com Nathaniel J. Kritzer Steptoe & Johnson LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Tel. (212) 378-7535 Fax (212) 506-3950 nkritzer@steptoe.com (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendants Avison Young (Canada) Inc., Avison Young (USA) Inc., Avison Young–Nevada LLC, Mark Rose, Joseph Kupiec, The Nevada Commercial Group LLC, and John Pinjuv 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?