Jamal Damon Hendrix v. Cox et al

Filing 52

ORDER Denying 45 Motion To Extend Copy Work Limit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/27/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX, ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-00560-MMD-NJK 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER (Docket No. 45) Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to extend his copy work limit. Docket No. 45. Defendants filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 47. No reply has been filed. 18 An inmate has no constitutional right to free photocopying. Johnson v. Moore, 948 F.2d 517, 19 521 (9th Cir. 1991). Pursuant to NDOC regulations, inmates can only accrue a maximum of $100 debt 20 for copy work expenses for all cases. See, e.g., Weddle v. Baker, 2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 151674, *3 (D. 21 Nev. Oct. 27, 2014). “In this district, courts have found that they can order a prison to extend limited 22 photocopying when it is necessary for an inmate to provide copies to the Court and other parties.” Id. 23 (citing Allen v. Clark Cnty. Det. Ctr., 2011 U.S. Dist. Lexis 31756 (D. Nev. Mar. 11, 2011)). 24 In this instance, Plaintiff has filed a form motion related to habeas proceedings. See Docket No. 25 45. No showing has been made that additional photocopying is necessary in relation to this particular 26 case, nor has a showing been made that other means of copying (including using carbon paper) are not 27 available. 28 1 Accordingly, the motion to extend Plaintiff’s copy work limit is hereby DENIED. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 DATED: July 27, 2016 4 5 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?