Smith v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc et al
Filing
18
ORDER that 14 Three Day Home Sales, LLC's Emergency Motion to Intervene under FRCP 24(a) for the limited purpose of seeking to cancel the lis pendens is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must appear before Hon. Judge Jennifer Dorsey i n Courtroom 6D of the Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse at 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South on April 4, 2016, at 1:30 p.m., at which plaintiff must demonstrate through affidavits and other evidence the court may permit that he can satisfy the requireme nts in NRS 14.015 such that the lis pendens should not be cancelled. Plaintiff's failure to appear and provide that proof will result in the cancellation of the lis pendens (ECF 13 ) without further notice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/10/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Raymond Smith,
2:15-cv-00565-JAD-GWF
Plaintiff
5
6
v.
7
Accredited Home Lenders, et al.
Order Granting Emergency
Motion to Intervene and Scheduling
Show Cause Hearing
Defendant
8
[ECF 14]
9
Plaintiff Raymond Smith purchased a home on Brisbane Place in 2006 and secured his
10
11
mortgage with a deed of trust in favor of Accredited Home Lenders, Inc.1 Smith claims that
12
the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) assigned that deed of trust to
13
Household Finance Reality Corp. of Nevada Mortgage in 2012, in an attempt “to fraudulently
14
steal plaintiff’s home” and transfer assets that belonged to Accredited’s Chapter 11
15
bankruptcy trustee.2 Smith sued Accredited and U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., but I dismissed the
16
claims against U.S. Bank Trust on its unopposed motion.3 Accredited—the lone remaining
17
defendant—has not appeared.
Non-party Three Day Home Sales, LLC moves to intervene in this action. Three Day
18
19
explains that Smith lost the home in an October 2014 foreclosure sale at which U.S. Bank
20
Trust was the purchaser.4 Three Day bought it from U.S. Bank Trust in October 2015, and is
21
under contract to sell it to a new buyer. In fact, the sale was scheduled to close on February
22
10, 2016, but Smith filed and recorded a notice of lis pendens against the property, clouding
23
24
1
ECF 1, ECF 14 at 4.
2
ECF 1.
3
ECF 11.
4
ECF 14.
25
26
27
28
1
1
title and preventing Three Day from conveying clear title.5 I grant Three Day’s motion to
2
intervene6 and order Raymond Smith to show cause by March 28, 2016, why the notice of lis
3
pendens should not be expunged.
Discussion
4
5
A.
Motion to intervene
A third party may intervene in a case as a matter of right under Federal Rule of Civil
6
7
Procedure 24(a) when it can satisfy four factors: (1) its motion is timely; (2) the applicant has
8
a “significantly protectable” interest relating to the property that is the subject of the action;
9
(3) the applicant is so situated that the disposition of the action may, as a practical matter,
10
impair or impede its ability to protect that interest; and (4) the applicant’s interest is
11
inadequately represented by the parties to the action.7 These requirements are “broadly
12
interpreted in favor of intervention.”8
Three Day has satisfied all of these requirements.9 It filed this motion less than 30
13
14
days after Smith filed and recorded the lis pendens and triggered Three Day’s interest in this
15
suit. It has demonstrated that it has a “significantly protectable” interest in the property and
16
without intervention, cannot protect that interest: it is the record owner of the property10 that
17
18
5
Id.
19
6
ECF 14.
20
7
Sierra Club v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 995 F.2d 1478, 1481 (9th Cir. 1993).
21
8
Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass’n, 647 F.3d 893, 897 (9th Cir. 2011).
22
9
26
FRCP 24(c) requires a motion to intervene be “accompanied by a pleading that sets out the claim
or defense for which intervention is sought.” But because Three Day does not seek to bring a claim
or defense—just to challenge the lis pendens—no pleading is necessary. I find that Three Day’s
motion, ECF 14, has sufficiently set out its position to satisfy FRCP 24(c). See Beckman Indus.,
Inc. v. Int’l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470 (1992) (“Courts, including this one, have approved intervention
motions without a pleading where the court was otherwise apprised of the grounds for the
motion.”).
27
10
23
24
25
28
ECF 16 at 4 (grant, bargain, sale deed). I grant the request to take judicial notice of these
recorded and filed documents. See ECF 16.
2
1
Smith filed a notice of lis pendens,11 and that this lis pendens is clouding the title and
2
preventing a contracted sale to close.12 And no party is adequately representing Three Day’s
3
interests; the claims against U.S. Bank have been dismissed, and the lone remaining
4
defendant—Accredited Home Lenders—has not appeared. Accordingly, I grant Three Day’s
5
motion to intervene in this action as of right for the limited purpose of seeking to expunge the
6
lis pendens.
7
B.
Three Day asks the court to “enter an order cancelling the notice of pendency of
8
9
Order to show cause why the lis pendens should not be cancelled
action” (ECF 13) “or, in the alternative, set the matter for hearing on the earliest possible
10
date.”13 NRS 14.015(1) allows a defendant to “request that the court hold a hearing on the
11
notice, and such a hearing must be set as soon as is practicable.”14 The plaintiff must then
12
“appear at the hearing and, through affidavits and other evidence [that] the court may permit,
13
establish to the satisfaction of the court that”:
14
1.
“The action is for the foreclosure of a mortgage upon the real property described in
15
the notice or affects the title or possession of the real property described in the
16
notice”;
17
2.
“The action was not brought in bad faith or for an improper motive”;
18
3.
He “will be able to perform any conditions precedent to the relief sought in the action
insofar as it affects the title or possession of the real property”;
19
20
4.
concluded”; and
21
22
He “would be injured by any transfer of an interest in the property before the action is
5.
He “is likely to prevail in the action” or “has a fair chance of success on the merits in
23
24
11
ECF 16 at 10.
12
ECF 16 at ¶ 6–9.
13
ECF 14.
14
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.015(1).
25
26
27
28
3
1
the action” and the injury he would suffer if the property were transferred “would be
2
sufficiently serious that the hardship on him . . . would be greater than the hardship on
3
the defendant resulting from the notice of pendency,” and if he prevails, he “will be
4
entitled to relief affecting the title or possession of the real property.”15
5
If the plaintiff fails to establish any of these elements, the court must order the notice of lis
6
pendens cancelled and order the plaintiff to “record with the recorder of the county a copy of
7
the order of cancellation.”16
The parties are hereby ordered to appear at a hearing before Hon. Judge Jennifer
8
9
Dorsey in Courtroom 6D of this court on April 4, 2016, at 1:30 p.m., at which the plaintiff
10
must demonstrate through affidavits and other evidence the court may permit that he can
11
satisfy the requirements in NRS 14.015 such that the lis pendens should not be cancelled.
12
Plaintiff’s failure to appear and provide that proof will result in the cancellation of the lis
13
pendens (ECF 13).
Conclusion
14
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Three Day Home Sales, LLC’s Motion
15
16
to Intervene under FRCP 24(a) for the limited purpose of seeking to cancel the lis pendens
17
[ECF 14] is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to add Three Day Home Sales,
18
LLC as an intervenor defendant.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must appear before Hon. Judge
19
20
Jennifer Dorsey in Courtroom 6D of the Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse at 333 Las
21
Vegas Boulevard South on April 4, 2016, at 1:30 p.m., at which plaintiff must
22
demonstrate through affidavits and other evidence the court may permit that he can satisfy
23
the requirements in NRS 14.015 such that the lis pendens should not be cancelled.
24
25
26
15
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.015(2)–(3).
16
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.015(5).
27
28
4
1
Plaintiff’s failure to appear and provide that proof will result in the cancellation of the lis
2
pendens (ECF 13) without further notice.
3
Dated this 10th day of March, 2016.
4
5
_________________________________
Jennifer A. Dorsey
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?