Wells Fargo Financial Nevada 2, Inc. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 60

ORDER Granting 59 Stipulation re 50 , 51 , and 53 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 4/4/2016. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/27/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jeffrey Willis, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 4797 Amy F. Sorenson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12495 Blakeley E. Griffith, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12386 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 Email: jwillis@swlaw.com asorenson@swlaw.com bgriffith@swlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Financial Nevada 2, Inc. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Snell & Wilmer 12 13 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL NEVADA 2, INC.; 14 Case No.: 2:15-cv-00576-RFB-CWH Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DATES 15 vs. 16 SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; LAUREL CANYON HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit corporation; ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC, a Nevada limited liability corporation; 17 18 19 (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 20 Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and among Plaintiff Wells 21 22 23 24 25 Fargo Financial Nevada 2, Inc. (“Wells Fargo”), Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”), and Defendant Laurel Canyon Homeowners Association (“Laurel Canyon,” and together with Wells Fargo and SFR, the “Parties”), through their respective undersigned attorneys, as follows: 1. 26 27 Wells Fargo filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on February 16, 2016 [Dkt. No. 50] (“Wells Fargo MSJ”). 2. 28 SFR filed its opposition to the Wells Fargo MSJ on March 11, 2016 [Dkt No. 57]. -123747996 1 2 3. [Dkt No. 54]. 3 4 4. 5. 6. 7. Snell & Wilmer 15 16 9. This is the Parties’ first request for an extension of time in which to file these replies, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. Rather, Wells Fargo sought and obtained an extension in good faith due to the work load of the attorneys and in order to provide time for Wells Fargo to properly review the oppositions to the Wells Fargo MSJ and to reply in support of the same. 17 18 The Parties’ replies to their respective motions for summary judgment and in response to the oppositions to the motions for summary judgment are due March 28, 2016. 12 14 Wells Fargo filed its opposition to the SFR MSJ on March 11, 2016 [Dkt. No. 55]. 8. 10 13 SFR filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on February 16, 2016 [Dkt. No. 53] (“SFR MSJ”). 9 11 Wells Fargo filed its opposition to the Laurel Canyon MSJ on March 11, 2016 [Dkt. No. 56]. 7 8 Laurel Canyon filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on February 16, 2016 [Dkt. No. 51] (“Laurel Canyon MSJ”). 5 6 Laurel Canyon filed its opposition to the Wells Fargo MSJ on March 11, 2016 10. The Parties wish to extend simultaneously their reply dates to their respective motions for summary judgment for one week or until April 4, 2016. 19 20 DATED this 24th day of March 2016. DATED this 24th day of March 2016. 21 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. KIM GILBERT EBRON /s/ Blakeley E. Griffith Jeffrey Willis (NV Bar No. 4797) Amy F. Sorenson (NV Bar No. 12495) Blakeley E. Griffith (NV Bar No. 12386) 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 /s/ Diana Cline Ebron Diana Cline Ebron (NV Bar No. 10580) Karen L. Hanks (NV Bar No. 9578) Jacqueline A. Gilbert (NV Bar No. 10593) Howard C. Kim (NV Bar No. 10386) 7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89139 Telephone: (702) 485-3300 Facsimile: (702) 485-3301 22 23 24 25 26 27 Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Attorneys for Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC 28 -223747996 1 DATED this 24th day of March 2016. 2 LEACH JOHNSON SONG & GRUCHOW 3 4 5 6 /s/ Timothy C. Pittsenbarger Timothy C. Pittsenbarger (NV Bar No. 13740) Sean L. Anderson (NV Bar No. 7259) 8945 West Russell Road, Suite 330 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Telephone: (702) 538-9074 Facsimile: (702) 538-9113 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant Laurel Canyon Homeowners Association 9 10 11 ORDER Snell & Wilmer 12 IT IS ORDERED that: 13 1. 14 15 16 its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment and response SFR’s and Laurel Canyon’s oppositions thereto; 2. 17 18 19 22 Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC shall have until April 4, 2016 to file its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment and response to the Wells Fargo’s opposition thereto; 3. 20 21 Plaintiff Wells Fargo Financial Nevada 2, Inc. shall have until April 4, 2016 to file Defendant Laurel Canyon Homeowners Association shall have until April 4, 2016 to file its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment and response to the Wells Fargo’s opposition thereto; 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 March 27, 2016. DATED: ________________________ 25 26 _________________________________ __________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 27 28 United States District Judge /// -323747996 1 Prepared and Submitted by: 2 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3 7 /s/ Blakeley E. Griffith Jeffrey Willis (NV Bar No. 4797) Amy F. Sorenson (NV Bar No. 12495) Blakeley E. Griffith (NV Bar No. 12386) 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 4 5 6 9 10 11 Snell & Wilmer 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -423747996 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on March _____, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DATES (FIRST REQUEST) with the 4 Clerk of Court for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada by using the Court’s CM/ECF 5 system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF 6 system. 7 DATED: March _____, 2016. 8 9 An Employee of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 10 11 Snell & Wilmer 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -523747996

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?