Wells Fargo Financial Nevada 2, Inc. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
60
ORDER Granting 59 Stipulation re 50 , 51 , and 53 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 4/4/2016. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/27/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Jeffrey Willis, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 4797
Amy F. Sorenson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12495
Blakeley E. Griffith, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12386
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: (702) 784-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
Email: jwillis@swlaw.com
asorenson@swlaw.com
bgriffith@swlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Financial
Nevada 2, Inc.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Snell & Wilmer
12
13
WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL
NEVADA 2, INC.;
14
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00576-RFB-CWH
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND REPLY DATES
15
vs.
16
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company;
LAUREL CANYON HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation; ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability corporation;
17
18
19
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
20
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and among Plaintiff Wells
21
22
23
24
25
Fargo Financial Nevada 2, Inc. (“Wells Fargo”), Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
(“SFR”), and Defendant Laurel Canyon Homeowners Association (“Laurel Canyon,” and
together with Wells Fargo and SFR, the “Parties”), through their respective undersigned
attorneys, as follows:
1.
26
27
Wells Fargo filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on February 16, 2016 [Dkt.
No. 50] (“Wells Fargo MSJ”).
2.
28
SFR filed its opposition to the Wells Fargo MSJ on March 11, 2016 [Dkt No. 57].
-123747996
1
2
3.
[Dkt No. 54].
3
4
4.
5.
6.
7.
Snell & Wilmer
15
16
9.
This is the Parties’ first request for an extension of time in which to file these
replies, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. Rather, Wells Fargo
sought and obtained an extension in good faith due to the work load of the attorneys and in order
to provide time for Wells Fargo to properly review the oppositions to the Wells Fargo MSJ and to
reply in support of the same.
17
18
The Parties’ replies to their respective motions for summary judgment and in
response to the oppositions to the motions for summary judgment are due March 28, 2016.
12
14
Wells Fargo filed its opposition to the SFR MSJ on March 11, 2016 [Dkt. No. 55].
8.
10
13
SFR filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on February 16, 2016 [Dkt. No. 53]
(“SFR MSJ”).
9
11
Wells Fargo filed its opposition to the Laurel Canyon MSJ on March 11, 2016
[Dkt. No. 56].
7
8
Laurel Canyon filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on February 16, 2016
[Dkt. No. 51] (“Laurel Canyon MSJ”).
5
6
Laurel Canyon filed its opposition to the Wells Fargo MSJ on March 11, 2016
10.
The Parties wish to extend simultaneously their reply dates to their respective
motions for summary judgment for one week or until April 4, 2016.
19
20
DATED this 24th day of March 2016.
DATED this 24th day of March 2016.
21
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
KIM GILBERT EBRON
/s/ Blakeley E. Griffith
Jeffrey Willis (NV Bar No. 4797)
Amy F. Sorenson (NV Bar No. 12495)
Blakeley E. Griffith (NV Bar No. 12386)
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: (702) 784-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
/s/ Diana Cline Ebron
Diana Cline Ebron (NV Bar No. 10580)
Karen L. Hanks (NV Bar No. 9578)
Jacqueline A. Gilbert (NV Bar No. 10593)
Howard C. Kim (NV Bar No. 10386)
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
Telephone: (702) 485-3300
Facsimile: (702) 485-3301
22
23
24
25
26
27
Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A.
Attorneys for Defendant SFR Investments
Pool 1, LLC
28
-223747996
1
DATED this 24th day of March 2016.
2
LEACH JOHNSON SONG & GRUCHOW
3
4
5
6
/s/ Timothy C. Pittsenbarger
Timothy C. Pittsenbarger (NV Bar No. 13740)
Sean L. Anderson (NV Bar No. 7259)
8945 West Russell Road, Suite 330
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Telephone: (702) 538-9074
Facsimile: (702) 538-9113
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant Laurel Canyon
Homeowners Association
9
10
11
ORDER
Snell & Wilmer
12
IT IS ORDERED that:
13
1.
14
15
16
its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment and response SFR’s and Laurel Canyon’s
oppositions thereto;
2.
17
18
19
22
Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC shall have until April 4, 2016 to file its
reply in support of its motion for summary judgment and response to the Wells Fargo’s
opposition thereto;
3.
20
21
Plaintiff Wells Fargo Financial Nevada 2, Inc. shall have until April 4, 2016 to file
Defendant Laurel Canyon Homeowners Association shall have until April 4, 2016
to file its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment and response to the Wells Fargo’s
opposition thereto;
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
March 27, 2016.
DATED: ________________________
25
26
_________________________________
__________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
27
28
United States District Judge
///
-323747996
1
Prepared and Submitted by:
2
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3
7
/s/ Blakeley E. Griffith
Jeffrey Willis (NV Bar No. 4797)
Amy F. Sorenson (NV Bar No. 12495)
Blakeley E. Griffith (NV Bar No. 12386)
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: (702) 784-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
4
5
6
9
10
11
Snell & Wilmer
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-423747996
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on March _____, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DATES (FIRST REQUEST) with the
4
Clerk of Court for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada by using the Court’s CM/ECF
5
system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF
6
system.
7
DATED: March _____, 2016.
8
9
An Employee of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
10
11
Snell & Wilmer
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-523747996
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?