Nevada Sand Castle, LLC v. Green Tree Servicing LLC et al

Filing 32

ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on Motion to Consolidate (First Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/16/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Colt B. Dodrill, Esq. (SBN 9000) WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 980 Kelly Johnson Drive, Ste 140 Las Vegas, NV 89119 Tel: (602) 953-0100 Fax: (602) 953-0101 cbdodrill@wolfewyman.com Attorneys for Defendant Green Tree Servicing LLC, now known as Ditech Financial LLC, and Intervenor/Counterclaimant Federal National Mortgage Association 6 7 8 9 Leslie Bryan Hart, Esq. (SBN 4932) John D. Tennert, Esq. (SBN 11728) FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. 300 E. Second St., Suite 1510 Reno, Nevada 89501 Tel: 775-788-2228 Fax: 775-788-2229 lhart@fclaw.com; jtennert@fclaw.com 10 Attorneys for Intervenor/Counterclaimant Federal Housing Finance Agency 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 NEVADA SAND CASTLES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC; RECONSTRUST COMPANY, N.A.; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; PRLAP, INC.; DOES IX, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I-X, inclusive, Defendants. and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; and FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, as Conservator of the Federal National Mortgage Association, Intervenors. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; and FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, as Conservator of the Federal National Mortgage Association, Counterclaimants, vs. NEVADA SAND CASTLES, LLC, Counter-Defendant. 27 28 FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. 300 E. SECOND ST. SUITE 1510 RENO, NEVADA 89501 (775) 788-2200 11271821 CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00588-GMN-VCF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE FIRST REQUEST 1 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Nevada Sand Castles, LLC (“Nevada Sand Castles”), 2 Defendant 3 Intervenor/Counterclaimant, Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), and 4 Intervenor/Counterclaimant, Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), by and through their 5 attorneys of record, submit the following stipulation for the Court’s review and approval. Green Tree Servicing LLC, now known as Ditech Financial LLC, 6 WHEREAS, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to entry of order and entered its 7 order permitting Fannie Mae and FHFA to intervene in this action on January 13, 2016. (Dkt. 8 28.) 9 WHEREAS, on February 12, 2016, Fannie Mae and FHFA filed a Motion to Consolidate 10 this action with a defendants’ class action that Fannie Mae, FHFA, and the Federal Home Loan 11 Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac,” and with Fannie Mae, the “Enterprises”) have filed in 12 this District, FHFA v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, No. 2:15-cv-1338-GMN-CWH (D. Nev.) 13 (“Putative Class Action”). (Dkt. 30.) 14 WHEREAS, the purpose of the Motion to Consolidate, and of similar motions filed or to 15 be filed in other related actions, is to facilitate the efficient management of a growing number of 16 related cases that, despite minor, non-dispositive factual differences, all turn on the same 17 dispositive legal issue: whether a homeowner’s association foreclosure sale conducted under 18 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.3116(2) (“HOA Sale”) may extinguish the Enterprises’ property interests. 19 WHEREAS, Nevada Sand Castles consents to the Motion to Consolidate. 20 WHEREAS, until the Court decides the Motion to Consolidate, the parties agree to stay 21 discovery, including the conference, discovery plan and report required by Rule 26(f) of the 22 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) and Rule 26-1(d) of the Local Rules of Practice for 23 the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (“LR”), and the initial disclosures 24 required by FRCP 26(a). 25 WHEREAS, the parties agree that the interests of efficiency and judicial economy 26 would be served by consolidation of this action with the Putative Class Action. The efficiencies 27 to this Court and to the parties would be diminished if the parties were required to pursue 28 discovery while the Motion to Consolidate is pending. FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. 300 E. SECOND ST. SUITE 1510 RENO, NEVADA 89501 (775) 788-2200 11271821 2 1 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among 2 the parties, through their undersigned counsel, that all discovery is stayed pending a ruling on the 3 Motion to Consolidate. 4 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this Stipulation is entered into 5 in good faith and not for the purposes of delay, and is not intended to waive any of the 6 substantive or procedural right of the parties. The parties have not previously requested any stay 7 of discovery. DATED this 12th day of February, 2016. 8 9 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. By: By: 10 11 12 13 14 15 /s/ Colt Dodrill ______ Colt B. Dodrill (SBN 9000) 980 Kelly Johnson Drive, Ste 140 Las Vegas, NV 89119 Tel: (602) 953-0100 Fax: (602) 953-0101 cbdodrill@wolfewyman.com Attorneys for Defendant Green Tree Servicing LLC, nka, Ditech Financial LLC, and Intervenor/Counterclaimant Federal National Mortgage Association /s/ Leslie Bryan Hart Leslie Bryan Hart, Esq. (SBN 4932) John D. Tennert, Esq. (SBN 11728) 300 E. Second St., Suite 1510 Reno, Nevada 89501 Tel: 775-788-2228 Fax: 775-788-2229 lhart@fclaw.com; jtennert@fclaw.com Attorneys for Intervenor/Counterclaimant Federal Housing Financing Agency 16 17 NOGGLE LAW 18 By: 19 20 21 22 /s/ Alex Ghibaudo Robert B. Noggle, Esq. (SBN 11427) Alex Ghibaudo, Esq. (SBN 10592) 376 East Warm Springs, Rd., Ste 140 Las Vegas, NV 89119 Tel: 702-450-6300 Fax: 702- 642-9766 robert@nogglelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Nevada Sand Castles, LLC 23 ORDER 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 ________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. 300 E. SECOND ST. SUITE 1510 RENO, NEVADA 89501 (775) 788-2200 DATED: ________________________ 11271821 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?