Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 238 plaintiff Victor Tagle's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days of the entry of this order, the remaining parties shall file a proposed joint pretrial order.Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/29/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No. 2:15-cv-00623-APG-GWF
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
REVIEW AND ORDERING THE
REMAINING PARTIES TO PREPARE
A PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL
(ECF NO. 238)
Plaintiff Victor Tagle moves for review of my order denying his summary judgment
motion. ECF No. 238. I deny the motion. Tagle does not provide a basis for reconsideration. See
Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993).
I granted defendant Kyle Groover’s motion for summary judgment on October 23, 2017.
ECF No. 236. Defendant Manuel Portillo did not move for summary judgment. Tagle’s claims
against him therefore remain pending. Pursuant to the scheduling order, the parties were to file a
proposed joint pretrial order 30 days after a ruling on dispositive motions. ECF No. 127. More
than 30 days have passed since I ruled on Groover’s summary judgment motion, but no proposed
joint pretrial order has been filed. I therefore direct the remaining parties to file one within 20
days. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of the remainder of this action.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff Victor Tagle’s motion for reconsideration
(ECF No. 238) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days of the entry of this order, the remaining
parties shall file a proposed joint pretrial order. Failure to timely file a proposed joint pretrial
order may result in dismissal of the remainder of this action.
DATED this 29th day of November, 2017.
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?