Toliver v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 29

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 27 Motion for Order of Subpoena as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 09/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 GEORGE A. TOLIVER, 8 9 v. Case No. 2:15-cv-00633-GMN-PAL Plaintiff, ORDER 10 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Mot. Subpoena – ECF No. 27) This matter is before the court on Plaintiff George A. Toliver’s Motion for Order of Subpoena (ECF No. 27), dated August 25, 2016, and filed August 29th. On August 23rd, the court granted Plaintiff’s first Motion for Order of Subpoena (ECF No. 16) and issued a subpoena deuces tecum to the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (“LVMPD”) requiring the custodian of records for LVMPD to disclose the full name, address, and phone number for Defendant Officer Doss (P#971) directly to the U.S. Marshals Service so it may attempt service again. See Order (ECF No. 24). The current motion appears to have crossed in the mail with the court’s Order because the current motion duplicates the first request for a subpoena. Because the court has already issued a subpoena to LVMPD, the current motion is denied as moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff George A. Toliver’s Motion for Order of Subpoena (ECF No. 27) is DENIED as moot. Dated this 14th day of September, 2016. 26 PEGGY A. LEEN PEGGY A. LEEN GY L E Y UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?