Toliver v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Filing
29
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 27 Motion for Order of Subpoena as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 09/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
GEORGE A. TOLIVER,
8
9
v.
Case No. 2:15-cv-00633-GMN-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER
10
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(Mot. Subpoena – ECF No. 27)
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff George A. Toliver’s Motion for Order of
Subpoena (ECF No. 27), dated August 25, 2016, and filed August 29th. On August 23rd, the
court granted Plaintiff’s first Motion for Order of Subpoena (ECF No. 16) and issued a subpoena
deuces tecum to the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (“LVMPD”) requiring the
custodian of records for LVMPD to disclose the full name, address, and phone number for
Defendant Officer Doss (P#971) directly to the U.S. Marshals Service so it may attempt service
again. See Order (ECF No. 24). The current motion appears to have crossed in the mail with the
court’s Order because the current motion duplicates the first request for a subpoena. Because the
court has already issued a subpoena to LVMPD, the current motion is denied as moot.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff George A. Toliver’s Motion for Order of Subpoena (ECF
No. 27) is DENIED as moot.
Dated this 14th day of September, 2016.
26
PEGGY A. LEEN
PEGGY A. LEEN
GY L E
Y
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?