Invest Vegas, LLC v. 21st Mortgage Corporation et al
Filing
88
ORDER granting 87 Stipulation to Continue hearing on 79 Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing is reset for 2/19/2021 at 01:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/3/2021. The parties must email Tawnee Renfro with an email address to be used for the video conference hearing by 2/18/2021 at 12:00 p.m. The parties are directed to refer 86 for additional instructions regarding appearing at the video hearing. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) Modified on 2/3/2021 (DRS).
1
2
3
4
5
MICHAEL R. BROOKS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 007287
HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC
Peccole Professional Park
10080 West Alta Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 385.2500
Facsimile: (702) 385.2086
Email: mbrooks@hutchlegal.com
st
6 Attorneys for 21 Mortgage Corporation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
INVEST VEGAS, LLC; MDM CONSULTANTS,
9 INC.
10
Plaintiff,
v.
11
ST
12 21
13
14
15
16
17
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00644-VCF
MORTGAGE CORPORATION; CALWESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION;
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF
NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA;
COMMERICAL LAND TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY;
ONTARIO
CONDOMINIUM
RENTAL SERVICES INC.; TICOR TITLE OF
NEVADA, INC.; HARLEE S. CARTER; LANA
CARTER; CARREN C. BOUTON; DOES I through
X, inclusive; ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through
X, inclusive
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING ON DEFENDANT 21ST
MORTGAGE CORPORATION’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
1
21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION
2
3
Counterclaimant,
v.
4 MDM CONSULTANTS, INC.,
5
6
7
8
9
10
Counterdefendants.
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT 21ST MORTGAGE
CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WHEREAS, Counsel for 21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION (“Defendant”) is
requesting a continuance of the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment to
accommodate his personal schedule in light of his daughter’s wedding on February 6, 2021;
WHEREAS, counsel for MDM CONSULTANTS (“Plaintiff”) and Opposing Party has
11 agreed to accommodate Plaintiff’s counsel’s request;
12
WHEREAS, the parties wish to continue this matter at least one week to a date
13 convenient for the Court;
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant (collectively, the
“Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to continue the
hearing on Defendant 21st Mortgage Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment to a date at
the Court’s convenience.
DATED this 2nd day of February, 2021.
DATED this 2nd day of February, 2021.
By /s/ Michael R. Brooks___________
Michael R. Brooks, Esq. (007287)
HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC
Peccole Professional Park
10080 West Alta Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
By /s/ Garrett R. Chase________________
Garrett R. Chase, Esq. (014498)
SHUMWAY VAN
8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Attorneys for Defendant
21st Mortgage Corporation
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MDM Consultants, Inc.
23
Page 2 of 3
1
ORDER
2
IT IS SO ORDERED:
The video hearing on the motion for summary judgment scheduled for February 5, 2021, is VACATED
3 and RESCHEDULED.
Defendant 21st Mortgage Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment shall be heard on
4 February 19, 2021
1:00 PM
______________________ at ________________ a.m./p.m.
5
6
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2-3-2021
Dated:
_________
7
8 Respectfully Submitted by:
9 HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC
10
/S/ MICHAEL R. BROOKS___________
Michael R. Brooks, Esq. (007287)
11 Peccole Professional Park
10080 West Alta Drive, Suite 200
12 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
The parties must email Tawnee Renfro with an email
address to be used for the video conference hearing
by noon,February 18, 2021.
The parties are directed to refer to ECF No. 86 for
additional instructions regarding appearing at the
video hearing.
13 Attorneys for Defendant
21st Mortgage Corporation
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?