Invest Vegas, LLC v. 21st Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 98

ORDER granting 95 Stipulation to Extend Time. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/4/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/31/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 GARRETT R. CHASE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14498 SHUMWAY VAN 8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Telephone: (702) 478-7770 Facsimile: (702) 478-7779 Email: garrett@shumwayvan.com Attorney for MDM Consultants, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Telephone: (702) 478-7770 Facsimile: (702) 478-7779 9 10 11 INVEST VEGAS LLC; MDM CONSULTANTS, INC. Case No.: 2:15-cv-00644-VCF Plaintiff, v. 12 19 21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION; CALWESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION; NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA; COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; ONTARIO CONDOMINIUM RENTAL SERVICES, INC; HARLEE S. CARTER; LANA CARTER; DARREN C. BOUTON; DOES I through X, inclusive; ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X inclusive. 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PRE-TRIAL ORDER DEADLINE AND CONTINUE TRIAL Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 (FIRST REQUEST) 21 22 Plaintiff MDM Consultants (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 21st Mortgage Corporation 23 (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, 24 hereby stipulate and agree that the pre-trial deadlines in this matter be continued by 60 days to 25 allow the Court to resolve Defendant’s pending Motion for Reconsideration, and to allow the 26 Parties to discuss potential resolution of this matter. Specifically, the Parties are requesting that 27 the current deadline to submit the Joint Pretrial Order, currently scheduled for April 5, 2021, be 28 extended 60 days or to after such time as this Court has resolved the pending Motion for 1 1 Reconsideration. Though not yet scheduled, the Parties also request that the trial in this matter be 2 continued accordingly. This is the first stipulation of the Parties to continue these deadlines, and 3 the time of trial in this matter. As the relevant timelines have not lapsed, and as this request will 4 allow the parties to discuss settlement potential and allow the Court time to resolve Defendant’s 5 pending Motion for Reconsideration, good cause exists for this stipulated request. Further, this 6 Stipulation complies with the relevant provisions of LR IA 6-1(a) and LR 26-4. Accordingly, the 7 Parties propose that the deadline for the Joint Pretrial Order be continued until June 4, 2021, or 30 8 days after the Court announces its decision regarding Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration. 8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Telephone: (702) 478-7770 Facsimile: (702) 478-7779 9 10 DATED this 30th day of March, 2021. DATED this 30th day of March, 2021. 11 12 13 14 15 16 SHUMWAY VAN HUTCHINSON & STEFFEN, PLLC By: /s/ Garrett R. Chase GARRETT R. CHASE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14498 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89123 Attorney for MDM Consultants, Inc. By: /s/ Michael R. Brooks MICHAEL R. BROOKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7287 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89123 Attorney for 21st Mortgage Corporation 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 ORDER Upon Stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 4 a. Deadline to for Joint Pretrial Order: June 4, 2021. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 ______________________________ Cam Ferenbach United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 March 31, 2021 8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Telephone: (702) 478-7770 Facsimile: (702) 478-7779 9 10 Respectfully Submitted by: 11 SHUMWAY VAN 12 13 14 15 BY: /s/ Garrett R. Chase GARRETT R. CHASE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14498 8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89123 Attorney for MDM Consultants, Inc. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?