Invest Vegas, LLC v. 21st Mortgage Corporation et al
Filing
98
ORDER granting 95 Stipulation to Extend Time. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/4/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/31/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
GARRETT R. CHASE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 14498
SHUMWAY VAN
8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Telephone: (702) 478-7770
Facsimile: (702) 478-7779
Email: garrett@shumwayvan.com
Attorney for MDM Consultants, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Telephone: (702) 478-7770 Facsimile: (702) 478-7779
9
10
11
INVEST VEGAS LLC; MDM
CONSULTANTS, INC.
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00644-VCF
Plaintiff,
v.
12
19
21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION; CALWESTERN RECONVEYANCE
CORPORATION; NATIONAL CITY
MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF
NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA;
COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY; ONTARIO
CONDOMINIUM RENTAL SERVICES,
INC; HARLEE S. CARTER; LANA
CARTER; DARREN C. BOUTON; DOES I
through X, inclusive; ROE BUSINESS
ENTITIES I through X inclusive.
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
PRE-TRIAL ORDER DEADLINE AND
CONTINUE TRIAL
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
18
(FIRST REQUEST)
21
22
Plaintiff MDM Consultants (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 21st Mortgage Corporation
23
(“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record,
24
hereby stipulate and agree that the pre-trial deadlines in this matter be continued by 60 days to
25
allow the Court to resolve Defendant’s pending Motion for Reconsideration, and to allow the
26
Parties to discuss potential resolution of this matter. Specifically, the Parties are requesting that
27
the current deadline to submit the Joint Pretrial Order, currently scheduled for April 5, 2021, be
28
extended 60 days or to after such time as this Court has resolved the pending Motion for
1
1
Reconsideration. Though not yet scheduled, the Parties also request that the trial in this matter be
2
continued accordingly. This is the first stipulation of the Parties to continue these deadlines, and
3
the time of trial in this matter. As the relevant timelines have not lapsed, and as this request will
4
allow the parties to discuss settlement potential and allow the Court time to resolve Defendant’s
5
pending Motion for Reconsideration, good cause exists for this stipulated request. Further, this
6
Stipulation complies with the relevant provisions of LR IA 6-1(a) and LR 26-4. Accordingly, the
7
Parties propose that the deadline for the Joint Pretrial Order be continued until June 4, 2021, or 30
8
days after the Court announces its decision regarding Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration.
8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Telephone: (702) 478-7770 Facsimile: (702) 478-7779
9
10
DATED this 30th day of March, 2021.
DATED this 30th day of March, 2021.
11
12
13
14
15
16
SHUMWAY VAN
HUTCHINSON & STEFFEN, PLLC
By: /s/ Garrett R. Chase
GARRETT R. CHASE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 14498
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Attorney for MDM Consultants, Inc.
By: /s/ Michael R. Brooks
MICHAEL R. BROOKS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7287
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Attorney for 21st Mortgage Corporation
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
ORDER
Upon Stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED as follows:
4
a. Deadline to for Joint Pretrial Order: June 4, 2021.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
______________________________
Cam Ferenbach
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
March 31, 2021
8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Telephone: (702) 478-7770 Facsimile: (702) 478-7779
9
10
Respectfully Submitted by:
11
SHUMWAY VAN
12
13
14
15
BY: /s/ Garrett R. Chase
GARRETT R. CHASE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 14498
8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Attorney for MDM Consultants, Inc.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?