Edwards v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 17

ORDER that this case is dismissed as to Nationstar. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/27/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 BONNIE R. EDWARDS, Plaintiff, 5 vs. 6 7 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al., Defendants. 8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:15-cv-0651-GMN-CWH ORDER 9 10 On April 9, 2015, Plaintiff Bonnie R. Edwards (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint alleging 11 12 Fair Credit Reporting Act violations against Defendants Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”), 13 Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”), Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (“Nationstar”), and Experian 14 Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) (collectively, “Defendants”). (ECF No. 1). On 15 September 22, 2015, the Court issued an Order of Dismissal as to BANA and Experian under 16 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to effect timely service. (ECF No. 11). On 17 October 7, 2015, Nationstar filed an Answer to the Complaint, which included affirmative 18 defenses but no counterclaims. (ECF No. 12). On December 24, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Notice 19 of Voluntary Dismissal of Nationstar. (ECF No. 15).1 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 provides for the Dismissal of Actions: 21 (a) Voluntary Dismissal. (1) By the Plaintiff. (A) Without a Court Order. . . . [T]he plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: 22 23 24 1 25 On May 17, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Credit One. (ECF No. 16). As Credit One had not yet filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), the Clerk terminated Credit One pursuant to this Notice. As such, Nationstar is the only remaining defendant. Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. ... (2) By Court Order; Effect. Except as provided in Rule 41(a)(1), an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper. If a defendant has pleaded a counterclaim before being served with the plaintiff's motion to dismiss, the action may be dismissed over the defendant’s objection only if the counterclaim can remain pending for independent adjudication. Unless the order states otherwise, a dismissal under this paragraph (2) is without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) (emphasis added). Because Nationstar already filed an Answer prior to Plaintiff’s Notice of Dismissal, Plaintiff may not voluntarily dismiss her action under without a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Nevertheless, almost ten months have passed since Plaintiff filed her Notice of Dismissal, and Nationstar has not filed an objection. Moreover, Nationstar’s Answer did not include any counterclaims. Accordingly, for good cause appearing, the Court will dismiss this action as to Nationstar, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed as to Nationstar. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. 27 DATED this _____ day of October, 2016. 19 20 21 ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?