Porter v. Social Security Administration et al

Filing 36

ORDER that the Clerk's Office shall make Plaintiff's filing, Docket No. 24 , accessible to the Commissioner. The Commissioner shall then state whether it objects to the Court's consideration of this newly submitted evidence no later than July 29, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 GAIL E. PORTER, 7 Plaintiff(s), 8 vs. 9 10 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, 11 Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-00661-JCM-NJK ORDER 12 This case involves judicial review of administrative action by the Commissioner of Social 13 Security (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits. Pending 14 before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reversal and/or remand. Docket No. 33. The Commissioner 15 filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 35. The Commissioner also filed a cross-motion to affirm. 16 Docket No. 34. 17 On December 30, 2015, Plaintiff filed new medical evidence, which was subsequently sealed, 18 pursuant to the Local Rules, as it contained personal identifiers. Docket No. 24. Plaintiff’s filing 19 contains no proof of service. See id. There is no indication that the Commissioner is aware of this 20 evidence. See, e.g., Docket No. 34 at 2 (omitting mention of new evidence in case’s procedural history). 21 Accordingly, the Clerk’s Office shall make Plaintiff’s filing, Docket No. 24, accessible to the 22 Commissioner. The Commissioner shall then state whether it objects to the Court’s consideration of 23 this newly submitted evidence no later than July 29, 2016. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: July 18, 2016 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?