Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC v. RLP Mercer Valley, LLC et al

Filing 93

ORDER Granting 92 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 88 Motion for Reconsideration. Replies due by 2/13/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:15-cv-00668-JCM-CWH Document 92 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Bradley T. Wibicki, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11321
Yanxiong Li, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12807
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
[phone]; Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10

CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES,
LLC, a California limited liability company,

11
12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
RLP MERCER VALLEY, LLC, an unknown
limited liability company; SHADOW SPRINGS
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
Defendants.

16
17

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
RECONSIDER ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[First request]

RLP MERCER VALLEY, LLC,

18

Case No.: 2:15-cv-00668-JCM-CWH

Counter-Claimant,

19

vs.

20
21

CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES,
LLC, a California Limited Liability Company,

22

Counter-Defendant.

23
24

RLP MERCER VALLEY, LLC,
Cross-Claimant,

25
26
27
28

vs.
SHADOW SPRINGS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada domestic nonprofit Corporation; RED ROCK FINANCIAL

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:15-cv-00668-JCM-CWH Document 92 Filed 01/16/19 Page 2 of 3

1
2

SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company; DOES I through X; and ROE
CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive,

3

Cross-Defendants.

4
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN

5

SUPPORT OF MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

6

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [First request]

7

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC (“Carrington”), and

8
9
10

Defendant/Counterclaimant, RLP Mercer Valley, LLC (“RLP”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by
and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
On December 26, 2018, Carrington filed its Motion to Reconsider Order Denying

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 88]. On January 10, 2019, RLP filed its
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration [ECF No. 91] making Carrington’s Reply
deadline January 17, 2019.
The parties agree that Carrington shall have until February 13th , 2019, to file and serve
its Reply in Support of its Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment.
///
///
///
///

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:15-cv-00668-JCM-CWH Document 92 Filed 01/16/19 Page 3 of 3

1

This is the first extension to which the parties have sought regarding this motion.

2

Carrington seeks additional time due to the recent government shutdown causing delay in

3

counsel’s ability to obtain approval, as well as allowing counsel to pursue meaningful

4

settlement discussions to evaluate the possibility of resolving this matter in lieu of continuing

5

litigation/trial. This extension is not intended to delay these proceedings and granting Plaintiff’s

6

request will not prejudice any party.

7

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

8
DATED this 16th day of January, 2019.

DATED this 16th day of January, 2019.

10

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP

MORTENSON & RAFIE, LLP

11

/s/ Yanxiong Li, Esq.
Bradley T. Wibicki, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11321
Yanxiong Li, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12807
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC

/s/ Darius F. Rafie, Esq.
Darius F. Rafie, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6465
10781 W. Twain Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant, RLP
Mercer Valley, LLC

9

12
13
14
15
16
17

ORDER

18
19

PURSUANT to the Stipulation above and for good cause appearing:

20

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the deadline for the
to file its Reply in support of the Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Plaintiff’s

21

Carrington

22

Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-identified litigation, shall be extended to February

23

13, 2019 .

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

January 18, 2019.
Date this ______ day of ______________, 2019.
___
_
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Page 3 of 3