Isaza v. State of Nevada

Filing 9

ORDER that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for petitioner's failure to exhaust his available state-court remedies. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 RIGOBERTO ENRIQUE ISZAZ, 10 Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 D.W. NEVEN, et al., 13 Case No. 2:15-cv-00676-RFB-GWF Respondents. ORDER 14 15 The court directed petitioner to show cause why the court should not dismiss this action for his 16 failure to exhaust his available state-court remedies. Order (#4). Specifically, the court noted that 17 petitioner could not have exhausted any grounds because his direct appeal from the judgment of 18 conviction had commenced recently and briefing had not even started. See Sherwood v. Tomkins, 716 19 F.2d 632, 634 (9th Cir. 1983). Petitioner has submitted a brief and statement (#8). Petitioner’s 20 response does not address the court’s concern. Instead, petitioner is arguing that the trial court judge 21 violated his constitutional rights. This is a claim for relief that petitioner needs to raise on direct appeal, 22 not a defense to the exhaustion requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). 23 The court has reviewed again the on-line docket of the Nevada Supreme Court in Iszaz v. State, 24 No. 67550.1 The fast-track statement and the fast-track response have been filed, but there has been no 25 decision yet. This action is therefore completely unexhausted, and the court legally must and will 26 dismiss it. 27 1 28 2015). http://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseView.do?csIID=35754 (last visited July 6, 1 2 Reasonable jurists would not find the court’s decision to be debatable or wrong, and the court will not issue a certificate of appealability. 3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for 4 petitioner’s failure to exhaust his available state-court remedies. The clerk of the court shall enter 5 judgment accordingly. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 7 DATED: July 20, 2015. 8 9 _________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?