Gettman et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
23
ORDER Directing Parties to File a Joint Pretrial Order. Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/22/2015. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Bill Gettman,
5
2:15-cv-690-JAD-PAL
Plaintiff
Order Directing Parties to File Joint
Pretrial Order
6
vs.
7
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., dba Wal-Mart Supercenter
2050,
8
Defendant
9
10
Local Rule 16-3 requires all parties to “personally discuss settlement and prepare and lodge
11
with the Court a proposed joint pretrial order.”1 The joint pretrial order in this case was due
12
December 14, 2015.2 Plaintiff timely filed his own pretrial order and represents that counsel for
13
defendant notified him that she could not get a joint pretrial order approved in time for the December
14
14, 2015, deadline because “she was preparing for mediation, and was busy.”3
15
This is unacceptable.
16
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties must submit a JOINT pretrial order that
17
complies with Local Rule 16-3 by December 22, 2015. Counsel for defendant must take the
18
initiative to complete this process, and the parties are reminded that they must “personally discuss
19
settlement” before filing the joint pretrial order.
20
21
The parties are also notified that the process for preparing and filing motions in limine will
be governed by the following additional rules and considerations:
C
22
Before any motion in limine is filed, the parties must meet and confer (by
23
telephone or in person—not merely by email or some other form of writing) about the
24
substance of each contemplated in-limine issue and attempt to reach an agreement on
25
26
1
L.R. 16-3(c).
27
2
ECF 11.
28
3
ECF 22.
Page 1 of 3
1
the issue. Evidentiary agreements reached during this process should be
2
memorialized by a written stipulation. If the parties do not reach an agreement on an
3
issue and a motion in limine remains necessary, the motion must be accompanied
4
by a declaration or affidavit certifying that counsel actually conferred in good
5
faith to resolve the issue before the motion was filed (or re-filed). The failure to
6
include the certificate of counsel will result in the automatic denial of the motion
7
without the opportunity to cure this deficiency.
8
C
9
10
Motions in limine must address only true evidentiary issues and not be belated
motions for dispositive rulings disguised as a motion in limine.
C
Parties must include all in-limine issues in a SINGLE, omnibus motion that
11
numbers each issue consecutively; no party may file multiple, separate motions. This
12
format eliminates the need for redundant recitations of facts and introductory
13
statements of the law. If the size of the omnibus motion exceeds the page limit in the
14
local rule, see L.R. 7-4, a separate motion to exceed the page limits should be filed
15
contemporaneously with the omnibus motion; the motion to exceed page limits must
16
not be styled as an “emergency.”
17
C
If it becomes necessary to seek leave to file a reply in support of the motions, see L.R.
18
16-3(b), each side may file only a single request for leave. The parties should not
19
presume that the court will grant these requests for leave, so proposed orders granting
20
them should not be submitted.
21
C
The parties are cautioned that vague requests based on speculative issues, like
22
requests to generally preclude improper attorney arguments, violations of the golden
23
rule, or irrelevant evidence will be flatly denied. The court intends to follow the rules
24
of evidence and procedure at trial and expects the parties to do the same. Motions
25
seeking little more than an order enforcing a rule waste the court’s time and the
26
27
28
Page 2 of 3
1
parties’ resources. Counsel is strongly cautioned that abuse of the motion-in-limine
2
vehicle in this manner may result in sanctions against the attorneys.
3
Dated this 15th day of December, 2015
4
5
6
_________________________________
___________________
_
_
_
_
Jennifer A. Dorsey
nifer A. Dorsey
r D
United States District Judge
dS
Di i J d
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?