Gettman et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER Directing Parties to File a Joint Pretrial Order. Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/22/2015. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Bill Gettman, 5 2:15-cv-690-JAD-PAL Plaintiff Order Directing Parties to File Joint Pretrial Order 6 vs. 7 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., dba Wal-Mart Supercenter 2050, 8 Defendant 9 10 Local Rule 16-3 requires all parties to “personally discuss settlement and prepare and lodge 11 with the Court a proposed joint pretrial order.”1 The joint pretrial order in this case was due 12 December 14, 2015.2 Plaintiff timely filed his own pretrial order and represents that counsel for 13 defendant notified him that she could not get a joint pretrial order approved in time for the December 14 14, 2015, deadline because “she was preparing for mediation, and was busy.”3 15 This is unacceptable. 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties must submit a JOINT pretrial order that 17 complies with Local Rule 16-3 by December 22, 2015. Counsel for defendant must take the 18 initiative to complete this process, and the parties are reminded that they must “personally discuss 19 settlement” before filing the joint pretrial order. 20 21 The parties are also notified that the process for preparing and filing motions in limine will be governed by the following additional rules and considerations: C 22 Before any motion in limine is filed, the parties must meet and confer (by 23 telephone or in person—not merely by email or some other form of writing) about the 24 substance of each contemplated in-limine issue and attempt to reach an agreement on 25 26 1 L.R. 16-3(c). 27 2 ECF 11. 28 3 ECF 22. Page 1 of 3 1 the issue. Evidentiary agreements reached during this process should be 2 memorialized by a written stipulation. If the parties do not reach an agreement on an 3 issue and a motion in limine remains necessary, the motion must be accompanied 4 by a declaration or affidavit certifying that counsel actually conferred in good 5 faith to resolve the issue before the motion was filed (or re-filed). The failure to 6 include the certificate of counsel will result in the automatic denial of the motion 7 without the opportunity to cure this deficiency. 8 C 9 10 Motions in limine must address only true evidentiary issues and not be belated motions for dispositive rulings disguised as a motion in limine. C Parties must include all in-limine issues in a SINGLE, omnibus motion that 11 numbers each issue consecutively; no party may file multiple, separate motions. This 12 format eliminates the need for redundant recitations of facts and introductory 13 statements of the law. If the size of the omnibus motion exceeds the page limit in the 14 local rule, see L.R. 7-4, a separate motion to exceed the page limits should be filed 15 contemporaneously with the omnibus motion; the motion to exceed page limits must 16 not be styled as an “emergency.” 17 C If it becomes necessary to seek leave to file a reply in support of the motions, see L.R. 18 16-3(b), each side may file only a single request for leave. The parties should not 19 presume that the court will grant these requests for leave, so proposed orders granting 20 them should not be submitted. 21 C The parties are cautioned that vague requests based on speculative issues, like 22 requests to generally preclude improper attorney arguments, violations of the golden 23 rule, or irrelevant evidence will be flatly denied. The court intends to follow the rules 24 of evidence and procedure at trial and expects the parties to do the same. Motions 25 seeking little more than an order enforcing a rule waste the court’s time and the 26 27 28 Page 2 of 3 1 parties’ resources. Counsel is strongly cautioned that abuse of the motion-in-limine 2 vehicle in this manner may result in sanctions against the attorneys. 3 Dated this 15th day of December, 2015 4 5 6 _________________________________ ___________________ _ _ _ _ Jennifer A. Dorsey nifer A. Dorsey r D United States District Judge dS Di i J d 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?