Bank of America, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 25

ORDER Denying without prejudice 24 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. The parties shall file a proper proposed discovery plan no later than July 28, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/21/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

12

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

13

Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan, Docket No. 24, which is

14

hereby DENIED without prejudice. First, the parties seek more than the presumptively reasonable

15

180-day discovery period, but the request for additional time appears to be based on a

16

misunderstanding. One of the reasons provided for the special scheduling review is “the court’s

17

informal stay and certification of a question to the Nevada Supreme Court.” Docket No. 24, at 2.

18

There is, however, no such motion to certify a question of law in this case. See Docket. Therefore,

19

this is an insufficient reason to allow for a longer discovery period.

8
Plaintiff(s),
9
vs.
10
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1 LLC, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).

Case No. 2:15-cv-00691-JCM-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 24)

20

Second, the parties fail to state the date the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared.

21

See Local Rule 26-1(e)(1); Docket No. 24, at 2. Third, the parties incorrectly calculate the number

22

of days for discovery from the filing of the proposed discovery plan, when the period must be

23

calculated from the date the first defendant answers or otherwise appears. See Local Rule 26-1(e)(1).

24

The parties shall file a proper proposed discovery plan no later than July 28, 2015.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

DATED: July 21, 2015

27
28
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge