Rama Sou, et al. vs Michael Bash, et al.
Filing
108
ORDER Granting 107 Stipulation to Strike and Replace Exhibits. The Clerk of Court is directed to seal ECF Nos. 103 -18 and 103 -26 and replace them with the redacted exhibits attached in ECF No. 107 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
EDWARD W. SUH (Admitted pro hac vice)
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL K. SUH & ASSOCIATES
3810 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1212
LOS ANGELES, CA 90010
Telephone: (213) 385-7347
Facsimile: (213) 383-3323
Edward@suhnassoclaw.com
11
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Phone: (702) 825-6060
FAX: (702) 447-8048
Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com
Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
10
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
RAMA SOU; TAI BUI;
SCOTT ZIMMERMAN,
Case No. 2:15-cv-00698-APG-VCF
and
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO STRIKE AND
REPLACE EXHIBITS
Plaintiffs,
v.
[LR IC 6-1]
MICHAEL BASH; JEREMY
BASH; BERKLEY
ENTERPRISES, INC.;
PEPPERDINE ENTERPRISES,
INC.; NINETY-FIVE FORT
APACHE COMPLEX, LLC;
ROYAL VIEW, LLC; and DOES 1
through 20, inclusive,
Defendants
26
27
28
1
Stipulation to Strike and Replace Exhibits
2:15-cv-00698-APG-VCF
1
2
TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
3
Plaintiffs Rama Sou, Tai Bui, and Scott Zimmerman (collectively,
4
“Plaintiffs”), on the one hand, and defendants Michael Bash, Jeremy Bash,
5
Berkley Enterprises, Inc., Pepperdine Enterprises, Inc., Ninety-Five Fort Apache
6
Complex, LLC, and Royal View, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), on the other
7
hand, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
8
9
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Summary
Judgment against Jeremy Bash, and included certain exhibits with the Motion;
10
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2017, Defendants’ counsel brought to Plaintiffs’
11
counsel’s attention that certain exhibits contained information that should have
12
been redacted;
13
WHEREAS, in light of the aforesaid, and in the interests of equity and
14
judicial economy, the parties agree to allow Plaintiffs to strike the non-compliant
15
exhibits and to replace the exhibits with those that have been properly redacted;
16
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the
17
parties, through their respective counsel of record, that good cause exists and it is
18
in the best interests of all parties that:
19
sealed
(1) ECF Docket 103.18 and 103.26 shall be struck, and replaced by the
103-18
20
103-28
redacted exhibits attached hereto.
21
22
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
24
25
Dated:
April 17, 2017
26
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL K. SUH &
ASSOCIATES
27
28
By: ___/s/ Edward W. Suh____________
Edward W. Suh
2
Stipulation to Strike and Replace Exhibits
2:15-cv-00698-APG-VCF
CA Bar No. 265356
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
1
2
Miles N. Clark
NV Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
3
4
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Rama Sou, Tai Bui, and Scott
Zimmerman
5
6
7
8
Dated:
April 17, 2017
LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW H.
PASTWICK L.L.C.
9
10
By: ___/s/ Andrew H. Pastwick________
11
Andrew H. Pastwick
NV Bar No. 009146
LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW H.
PASTWICK L.L.C.
12
13
Attorneys for Defendants
Michael Bash, Jeremy Bash, Berkley
Enterprises, Inc., Pepperdine Enterprises,
Inc., Ninety-Five Fort Apache Complex,
LLC, and Royal View, LLC
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
The Clerk of Court is directed to seal ECF Nos. 103-18 and 103-26 and replace them with the
redacted exhibits attached in ECF No. 107.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
21
22
23
____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
4-10-2017
DATED: __________________
27
28
3
Stipulation to Strike and Replace Exhibits
2:15-cv-00698-APG-VCF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?