Rama Sou, et al. vs Michael Bash, et al.

Filing 108

ORDER Granting 107 Stipulation to Strike and Replace Exhibits. The Clerk of Court is directed to seal ECF Nos. 103 -18 and 103 -26 and replace them with the redacted exhibits attached in ECF No. 107 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 EDWARD W. SUH (Admitted pro hac vice) LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL K. SUH & ASSOCIATES 3810 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1212 LOS ANGELES, CA 90010 Telephone: (213) 385-7347 Facsimile: (213) 383-3323 Edward@suhnassoclaw.com 11 Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 Phone: (702) 825-6060 FAX: (702) 447-8048 Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RAMA SOU; TAI BUI; SCOTT ZIMMERMAN, Case No. 2:15-cv-00698-APG-VCF and STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE AND REPLACE EXHIBITS Plaintiffs, v. [LR IC 6-1] MICHAEL BASH; JEREMY BASH; BERKLEY ENTERPRISES, INC.; PEPPERDINE ENTERPRISES, INC.; NINETY-FIVE FORT APACHE COMPLEX, LLC; ROYAL VIEW, LLC; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants 26 27 28 1 Stipulation to Strike and Replace Exhibits 2:15-cv-00698-APG-VCF 1 2 TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 3 Plaintiffs Rama Sou, Tai Bui, and Scott Zimmerman (collectively, 4 “Plaintiffs”), on the one hand, and defendants Michael Bash, Jeremy Bash, 5 Berkley Enterprises, Inc., Pepperdine Enterprises, Inc., Ninety-Five Fort Apache 6 Complex, LLC, and Royal View, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), on the other 7 hand, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 8 9 WHEREAS, on March 20, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Summary Judgment against Jeremy Bash, and included certain exhibits with the Motion; 10 WHEREAS, on April 7, 2017, Defendants’ counsel brought to Plaintiffs’ 11 counsel’s attention that certain exhibits contained information that should have 12 been redacted; 13 WHEREAS, in light of the aforesaid, and in the interests of equity and 14 judicial economy, the parties agree to allow Plaintiffs to strike the non-compliant 15 exhibits and to replace the exhibits with those that have been properly redacted; 16 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the 17 parties, through their respective counsel of record, that good cause exists and it is 18 in the best interests of all parties that: 19 sealed (1) ECF Docket 103.18 and 103.26 shall be struck, and replaced by the 103-18 20 103-28 redacted exhibits attached hereto. 21 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 23 24 25 Dated: April 17, 2017 26 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL K. SUH & ASSOCIATES 27 28 By: ___/s/ Edward W. Suh____________ Edward W. Suh 2 Stipulation to Strike and Replace Exhibits 2:15-cv-00698-APG-VCF CA Bar No. 265356 Admitted Pro Hac Vice 1 2 Miles N. Clark NV Bar No. 13848 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC 3 4 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Rama Sou, Tai Bui, and Scott Zimmerman 5 6 7 8 Dated: April 17, 2017 LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW H. PASTWICK L.L.C. 9 10 By: ___/s/ Andrew H. Pastwick________ 11 Andrew H. Pastwick NV Bar No. 009146 LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW H. PASTWICK L.L.C. 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants Michael Bash, Jeremy Bash, Berkley Enterprises, Inc., Pepperdine Enterprises, Inc., Ninety-Five Fort Apache Complex, LLC, and Royal View, LLC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 The Clerk of Court is directed to seal ECF Nos. 103-18 and 103-26 and replace them with the redacted exhibits attached in ECF No. 107. IT IS SO ORDERED: 21 22 23 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 4-10-2017 DATED: __________________ 27 28 3 Stipulation to Strike and Replace Exhibits 2:15-cv-00698-APG-VCF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?