Summit Real Estate Group, Inc. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Coropration et al

Filing 29

ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 7/22/2016. Motions due by 7/22/2016. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/8/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-00760-KJD-GWF Document 28 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 Zachary T. Ball, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8364 THE BALL LAW GROUP 3455 Cliff Shadows Parkway Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 Telephone: (702) 303-8600 Email: zball@balllawgroup.com Attorney for Plaintiff 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 SUMMIT REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. 14 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; M&T BANK, MITCHELL LABORWIT, individually, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 13 (702) 303-8600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 3455 Cliff Shadows Parkway, Suite 150 THE BALL LAW GROUP 11 12 Case No.: 2:15-cv-00760-KJD-GWF 16 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINES1 (Second Request) 17 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and their 20 respective counsel of record, that the current deadlines in this action be extended to those dates 21 specified below. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delaying 22 these proceedings and in furtherance of the previously granted extensions to provide for the 23 parties’ settlement conference [See Document Nos. 16, 20 and 24). No trial date is currently 24 set in this action. In addition, the parties are diligently working towards settlement. 25 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and their 26 27 28 1 This pleading is amended to further comply with LR 6-1 and 6-2. PAGE 1 OF 2 Case 2:15-cv-00760-KJD-GWF Document 28 Filed 05/03/16 Page 2 of 2 1 respective counsel of record, that the Plaintiff, SUMMIT REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC. 2 (“Plaintiff”) shall have through and including July 22, 2016 (an additional 15 days from July 7, 3 2016, the current pending date for the settlement conference set in the Court’s Minute Order 4 entered on April 21, 2016 as Document No. 25) to file a responsive pleading to Defendants, 5 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and M&T BANK (“Defendants”) 6 Motion for Summary Judgment. This stipulation is as to Plaintiff only as granted in the 7 Court’s Order entered on March 16, 2016 as Document No. 16. additional 15 days from July 7, 2016, the current pending date for the settlement conference set 11 in the Court’s Minute Order entered on April 21, 2016 as Document No. 25) to file any 12 dispositive motions. 13 (702) 303-8600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have through and including July 22, 2016 (an 10 3455 Cliff Shadows Parkway, Suite 150 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and their 9 THE BALL LAW GROUP 8 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and their 14 respective counsel of record, that the parties shall have through and including August 8, 2016 15 (an additional 30 days from the pending settlement conference) to file a Joint Pretrial Order. 16 DATED this 3rd day of May, 2016. Dated this 3rd day of May, 2016. /s/ Zachary T. Ball Zachary T. Ball, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8364 THE BALL LAW GROUP 3455 Cliff Shadows Parkway Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 Telephone: (702) 303-8600 Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Nathan Smith Nathan Smith, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12642 MALCOLM CISNEROS 2112 Business Center Drive, 2nd Floor Irvine, California 92612 Telephone: (949) 252-9400 Attorney for Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and M&T Bank 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3rd DATED this _____ day of May, 2016. 27 28 _________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAGE 2 OF 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?