Summit Real Estate Group, Inc. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Coropration et al
Filing
29
ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 7/22/2016. Motions due by 7/22/2016. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/8/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Case 2:15-cv-00760-KJD-GWF Document 28 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
Zachary T. Ball, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8364
THE BALL LAW GROUP
3455 Cliff Shadows Parkway
Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129
Telephone: (702) 303-8600
Email: zball@balllawgroup.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
SUMMIT REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC., a
Nevada Corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
14
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORPORATION; M&T BANK, MITCHELL
LABORWIT, individually, and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
15
Defendants.
13
(702) 303-8600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129
3455 Cliff Shadows Parkway, Suite 150
THE BALL LAW GROUP
11
12
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00760-KJD-GWF
16
AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINES1
(Second Request)
17
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and their
20
respective counsel of record, that the current deadlines in this action be extended to those dates
21
specified below. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delaying
22
these proceedings and in furtherance of the previously granted extensions to provide for the
23
parties’ settlement conference [See Document Nos. 16, 20 and 24). No trial date is currently
24
set in this action. In addition, the parties are diligently working towards settlement.
25
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and their
26
27
28
1
This pleading is amended to further comply with LR 6-1 and 6-2.
PAGE 1 OF 2
Case 2:15-cv-00760-KJD-GWF Document 28 Filed 05/03/16 Page 2 of 2
1
respective counsel of record, that the Plaintiff, SUMMIT REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC.
2
(“Plaintiff”) shall have through and including July 22, 2016 (an additional 15 days from July 7,
3
2016, the current pending date for the settlement conference set in the Court’s Minute Order
4
entered on April 21, 2016 as Document No. 25) to file a responsive pleading to Defendants,
5
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and M&T BANK (“Defendants”)
6
Motion for Summary Judgment. This stipulation is as to Plaintiff only as granted in the
7
Court’s Order entered on March 16, 2016 as Document No. 16.
additional 15 days from July 7, 2016, the current pending date for the settlement conference set
11
in the Court’s Minute Order entered on April 21, 2016 as Document No. 25) to file any
12
dispositive motions.
13
(702) 303-8600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129
respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have through and including July 22, 2016 (an
10
3455 Cliff Shadows Parkway, Suite 150
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and their
9
THE BALL LAW GROUP
8
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and their
14
respective counsel of record, that the parties shall have through and including August 8, 2016
15
(an additional 30 days from the pending settlement conference) to file a Joint Pretrial Order.
16
DATED this 3rd day of May, 2016.
Dated this 3rd day of May, 2016.
/s/ Zachary T. Ball
Zachary T. Ball, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8364
THE BALL LAW GROUP
3455 Cliff Shadows Parkway
Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129
Telephone: (702) 303-8600
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Nathan Smith
Nathan Smith, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12642
MALCOLM CISNEROS
2112 Business Center Drive, 2nd Floor
Irvine, California 92612
Telephone: (949) 252-9400
Attorney for Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation and M&T Bank
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3rd
DATED this _____ day of May, 2016.
27
28
_________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PAGE 2 OF 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?