Buhecker et al v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Filing 15

ORDER Granting 14 Stipulation to Extend Time re 11 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 11/13/2015. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 11/4/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Case 2:15-cv-00769-LDG-VCF Document 14 Filed 10/29/15 Page 1 of 3

5

TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7373
HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
703 South Eighth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
[phone] Tel.
[phone] Fax
[e-mail]

6

Attorney for Plaintiffs

1
2
3
4

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10
11
12

EVON BUHECKER; WILLIAM DOUGLAS;
ROBERTO FRANCHE; BRENDA PALMER;
JOHN PALMER MARVIN POPE; BRYAN
WISNER; individuals,

15
16
17

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S
MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs,

13
14

CASE NO: 2:15-cv-00769-LDG-VCF

vs.
DELTA AIRLINES, INC. a domestic corporation;
DOES
I
through
X,
inclusive;
ROE
CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive;
Defendants.

18

Plaintiff, EVON BUHECKER; WILLIAM DOUGLAS; ROBERTO FRANCHE; BRENDA

19

PALMER; JOHN PALMER MARVIN POPE; BRYAN WISNER, by and through their counsel,

20

Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq., of the law firm of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendant, DELTA

22

AIRLINES, INC. by and through its counsel, Scott M. Mahoney, Esq., of the law firm of Fisher &

28

21

Phillips, LLP, do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to

23
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Should Defendant need additional time for Defendant to respond to

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

24
25

Plaintiff’s response, Plaintiff is amenable to an extension. The reason that the extension is requested

26

is due to Plaintiff’s counsel needing additional time due to professional commitments and a planned

27

vacation due to the Nevada Day holiday on October 30, 2015. In addition, Plaintiff’s counsel is

28

1

Case 2:15-cv-00769-LDG-VCF Document 14 Filed 10/29/15 Page 2 of 3

1

chairing a seminar on veteran’s benefits in preparation for Veteran’s Day, November 11, 2015 that

2

has been time consuming and whereby additional time is requested in order to respond.

3
4

Accordingly, it is stipulated that Plaintiff shall have up to and including November 13, 2015
to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #11); should Defendant need additional time for

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s response, Plaintiff is amenable to an extension.
Dated: October 29, 2015

Dated: October 29, 2015

/s/ Trevor J. Hatfield
___________________________________
Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq., NV Bar #7373
HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LLC
703 S. Eighth St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Scott M. Mahoney
___________________________________
Scott M. Mahoney, Esq., NV Bar #7688
FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP
300 South Fourth Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Defendant

13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

Dated this ___ day of ____________, 2015.
November

17
_________________________________
MAGISTRATE/JUDGE
U.S. DISTRICT
LLOYD D. GEORGE

18
19
20
Respectfully submitted:
22
23

Dated October 29, 2015.
HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

28

21

/s/ Trevor J. Hatfield

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

24
25
26
27

By:
Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq. (SBN 7373)
703 South Eighth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
[phone] Tel.
Attorney for Plaintiff

28

2