US Bank, National Association v. NV Eagles, LLC, et al
Filing
97
ORDER DIRECTING CERTIFICATION TO THE NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2403(b). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/26/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS
TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS
OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET-BACKED
SECUIRITIES 1 TRUST 2006-AC5, ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-AC5,
9
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
2:15-cv-00786-RCJ
ORDER DIRECTING
vs.
CERTIFICATION TO THE
NV EAGLES, LLC et al.
NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendants.
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2403(b)
13
14
This case arises from the foreclosure of a residential property pursuant to a homeowners
15
association lien. On October 6, 2015, Plaintiff U.S. Bank filed a motion for summary judgment
16
(ECF No. 66) which questions the constitutionality of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.3116 et seq.
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2403(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.1(b), the Court issues this
18
order directing certification to the Nevada Attorney General, having recognized that neither the
19
State nor any of its agencies, officers, or employees are parties to the suit.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21 Dated: This 26th day of January, 2016.
Dated: _______________________
22
23
24
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
1
1
Certificate Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2403(b)
2
To: The Honorable Adam Paul Laxalt, Nevada Attorney General
3
4
On behalf of this Court, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2403(b) and Federal Rule of Civil
5
Procedure 5.1(b), I certify that in this case the constitutionality of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.3116 et
6
seq, a statute affecting the public interest, is drawn into question. The plaintiff in the suit has
7
challenged the statute based on the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (See ECF
8
No. 66).
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?