Picozzi v. Clark County Detention Center et al

Filing 31

ORDER that 17 Motion to Extend Time is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court SHALL SEND to the plaintiff twelve (12) USM-285 forms, one copy of the complaint and a copy of this order. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days within which to furnish the U.S. Marshall Service with USM-285 forms pursuant to the prior screening order (ECF No. 15 ). FURTHER ORDERED that 18 Request Leave to Amend is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 23 MOTION to Have Defendants Served is DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 MARK PICOZZI, 8 9 10 Case No. 2:15-CV-816 JCM (PAL) Plaintiff(s), ORDER v. SERGEANT JUDD, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Mark Picozzi’s motion for an extension of time 14 to furnish the U.S. Marshall Service with USM-285 forms. (ECF No. ECF No. 17). Defendants 15 have not responded and the deadline to do so has passed. Plaintiff also files a motion to have 16 defendants served. (ECF No. 23). 17 18 Plaintiff requests a sixty-day extension of time because he will be receiving medical care for kidney stones. Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for a sixty day extension is granted. 19 In the same motion, plaintiff requests leave to amend his complaint in order to name two 20 additional defendants. In accordance with Local Rule 2-2(B), plaintiff’s motion is improperly filed. 21 See LR 2-2(B) (“For each type of relief requested or purpose of the document, a separate document 22 must be filed and a separate event must be selected for that document”). The court therefore denies 23 plaintiff’s request. 24 Plaintiff’s motion to have defendants served (ECF No. 23) also does not follow proper 25 procedure. This court instructed plaintiff to furnish the U.S. Marshal with the required USM-285 26 forms which contain the relevant information as to each defendant on each form. (ECF No. 15 at 27 15). The court will instruct the clerk’s office to resend these forms. Plaintiff must fill them out and 28 send them to the U.S. Marshal in order to proceed. James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff’s motion to 3 extend time (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court SHALL SEND to the plaintiff 5 twelve (12) USM-285 forms, one copy of the complaint and a copy of this order. The plaintiff shall 6 have thirty (30) days within which to furnish to the U.S. Marshal the required USM-285 forms 7 with relevant information as to each defendant on each form. Within twenty (20) days after 8 receiving from the U.S. Marshal a copy of the USM-285 forms showing whether service has been 9 accomplished, the plaintiff must file a notice with the court identifying which defendants were 10 served and which were not served, if any. If the plaintiff wishes to have service against attempted 11 on an unserved defendant(s), then a motion must be filed with the court identifying the unserved 12 defendant(s) and specifying a more detailed name and/or address for said defendant(s), or whether 13 some other manner of service should be attempted. 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days within which to 15 furnish the U.S. Marshall Service with USM-285 forms pursuant to the prior screening order (ECF 16 No.15). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s request leave to amend is DENIED. (ECF No. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 18). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion to have defendants served (ECF No. 23), is DENIED consistent with the foregoing. DATED July 29, 2016. __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?