Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Elkhorn Community Association et al
Filing
42
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED that the deadline for Nationstar to file its Response to ATC Assessments Motion for Summary Judgment 37 is extended from 3/28/16 to 4/1/16. IT IS FURTHER AGREED AND STIPULATED that the deadline for ATC Assessment to file its Reply to Nationstar's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment 37 is extended from 4/7/16 to 4/11/16. This is the parties' first request for extension of these deadlines, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/5/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
Case 2:15-cv-00823-GMN-PAL Document 38 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 0050
Regina A. Habermas, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8481
7785 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
(702) 475-7964; Fax: (702) 946-1345
dnitz@wrightlegal.net
rhabermas@wrightlegal.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, a limited
liability company,
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00823-GMN-PAL
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ELKHORN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, a
Domestic Non-Profit Corporation;
702BUY.COM, LLC, a Domestic Limited
Liability Company; ATC ASSESSMENT
COLLECTION GROUP, LLC, a California
Limited Liability Company; NV
FORECLOSURE SERVICES, LLC, a
Domestic Limited Liability Company; ANGIUS
& TERRY COLLECTIONS, LLC, a Domestic
Limited Liability Company; DOES I through X;
and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X,
inclusive,
Defendants.
22
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE
vs.
Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (“Nationstar”), and Defendant ATC Assessment
24
Collection Group, LLC (“ATC Assessment”) by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate
25
as follows:
26
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED that the deadline for Nationstar to file its
27
Response to ATC Assessment’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #37) is extended from
28
March 28, 2016 to April 1, 2016.
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-00823-GMN-PAL Document 38 Filed 03/29/16 Page 2 of 3
1
IT IS FURTHER AGREED AND STIPULATED that the deadline for ATC Assessment
2
to file its Reply to Nationstar’s Response to Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #37) is
3
extended from April 7, 2016 to April 11, 2016.
4
This is the parties’ first request for extension of these deadlines, and is not intended to
5
cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
6
DATED this 29th day of March, 2016.
DATED this 29th day of March, 2016.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER &
GARIN, P.C.
/s/Regina A. Habermas
Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 0050
Regina A. Habermas, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8481
7785 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Nationstar
Mortgage, LLC
/s/Peter E. Dunkley
Joseph P. Garin, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6653
Kaleb D. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 7582
Peter E. Dunkley, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11110
9900 Covington Cross Drive, Ste. 120
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Attorney for Defendant ATC Assessment
Collection Group, LLC
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-00823-GMN-PAL Document 38 Filed 03/29/16 Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
4
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:
1. The date for Nationstar, to file its Response to Defendant ATC Assessment’s Motion for
Summary Judgment is extended to April 1, 2016.
5
2. The date for ATC Assessment, to file its Reply to Nationstar’s Response to ATC
6
Assessment’s Motion for Summary Judgment is extended to April 11, 2016.
7
8
DATED this
5 day of
, 2016.
April
9
10
UNITED STATES
Respectfully Submitted by:
11
12
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
13
14
15
16
17
18
/s/Regina A. Habermas
Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 0050
Regina A. Habermas, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8481
7785 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?