Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Elkhorn Community Association et al
Filing
74
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 73 the Substitution of Attorney is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Melanie Morgan and Thera A. Cooper of Akerman LLP are substituted in the place of Dana Nitz, Chelsea Crowton, and Regina Habermas of Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP for plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, subject to the provisions of LR IA 11-6(c) and (d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,
8
9
Case No. 2:15-cv-00823-GMN-PAL
Plaintiff,
v.
10
(Subst Atty – ECF No. 73)
ELKHORN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
et al.
11
ORDER
Defendants.
12
This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorneys (ECF No. 73). Melanie
13
Morgan and Thera A. Cooper of Akerman LLP seek leave to be substituted in the place of Dana
14
Nitz, Chelsea Crowton, and Regina Habermas of Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP for plaintiff Nationstar
15
Mortgage, LLC. LR IA 11-6(c) provides that the signature of an attorney to substitute in a case
16
“constitutes an express acceptance of all dates then set for pretrial proceedings, for trial or hearing,
17
by the discovery plan, or in any court order.” LR IA 11-6(d) also provides that the substitution of
18
an attorney “shall not alone be reason for delay of pretrial proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any
19
hearing in this case.”
20
Having reviewed and considered the matter,
21
IT IS ORDERED that:
22
1. The Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 73) is GRANTED.
23
2. Melanie Morgan and Thera A. Cooper of Akerman LLP are substituted in the place of
24
Dana Nitz, Chelsea Crowton, and Regina Habermas of Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP for
25
plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, subject to the provisions of LR IA 11-6(c) and (d).
26
DATED this 30th day of January, 2018.
27
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?