J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Barajas et al

Filing 21

ORDER. The Court hereby SETS a scheduling conference on 12/09/2015 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe regarding 20 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Prior to the hearing, Plaintiff's counsel and Mr. Ba rajas shall familiarize themselves with the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1.In addition, Mr. Barajas appears to be attempting to represented Defendant Timos, Inc. in this matter. Mr. Barajas i s advised that corporations may appear in federal court only through a licensed attorney. Mr. Barajas shall immediately attempt to obtain an attorney to appear on behalf of Defendant Timos,Inc., and shall be prepared to discuss the status of that process at the above hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/03/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTION, INC.,
7
Plaintiff(s),
8
vs.
9
TIMOTEO BARAJAS, et al.,
10
Defendant(s).
11

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:15-cv-0837-JAD-NJK
ORDER

12

Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 20. Discovery

13

plans must comply with the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and of

14

Local Rule 26-1. The pending discovery plan is deficient in numerous ways. The Court hereby SETS

15

a scheduling conference in this case for 3:30 p.m. on December 9, 2015, in Courtroom 3B. Prior to the

16

hearing, Plaintiff’s counsel and Mr. Barajas shall familiarize themselves with the above rules.

17

In addition, Mr. Barajas appears to be attempting to represented Defendant Timos, Inc. in this

18

matter.1 Mr. Barajas is advised that corporations may appear in federal court only through a licensed

19

attorney. See, e.g., United States v. High Country Broad. Co., Inc., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993).

20

Mr. Barajas shall immediately attempt to obtain an attorney to appear on behalf of Defendant Timos,

21

Inc., and shall be prepared to discuss the status of that process at the above hearing.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

DATED: December 3, 2015

24

______________________________________
_______________________
__ _
_
_
NANCY J. KOPPE
Y KOPPE
OP
OP E
United States Magistrate Judge
Magistrate
Ma istr t

25
26
27
28

1

From the Court’s review of the docket, it does not appear that Defendant Timos, Inc. has filed an
answer or otherwise formally appeared in this case.