Telepet USA, Inc. v Qualcomm, Incorporated, et al

Filing 81

ORDER that 80 Motion for Oral Argument on Defendant's Motion for Sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/24/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5
6
7
8
9

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
QUALCOMM, INCORPORATED, et al.,
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
TELEPET USA, INC.,

Case No. 2:15-cv-0846-JCM-GWF
ORDER

10
11

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Qualcomm, Incorporated, Snaptracs, Inc., Dudley

12

Fetzer, Alex Rogers, James Hoffman, and Dave Vigil’s (“Defendants”) Motion for Oral Argument on

13

Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 80), filed on October 18, 2016.

14

Defendants request that the Court set oral argument on their Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 32) that

15

was filed on July 13, 2015. Defendants moved for sanctions against Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 11 of the

16

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. After seeking an extension of time to file a response, Plaintiff filed its

17

Opposition on November 17, 2015 (ECF No. 71) and Defendants filed their Reply on December 1, 2015

18

(ECF No. 74). The Court granted Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss (ECF No. 22)

19

on November 24, 2015. Defendants filed their Notice of Final Award in Related Arbitration (ECF No. 76)

20

on September 14, 2016 and Plaintiff filed its Response (ECF No. 77) on October 3, 2016. As such, this case

21

was terminated on November 24, 2015 and Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions is no longer pending.

22

Accordingly,

23
24
25

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Oral Argument on Defendant’s Motion
for Sanctions (ECF No. 80) is denied.
DATED this 24th day of October, 2016.

26
27
28

______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge